Posted on 05/03/2021 11:31:34 AM PDT by Cathi
What is a vaccine passport for $200, Alex.
Coercion.
Yes, they refer to the current FDA classification in a document for investors advising them of the potential for negative public perception of that FDA classification. They have a fiduciary responsibility to inform investors of how something like a governmental regulator’s classification of a product might impact the success of that product and of the company as a whole.
They (Moderna) do not state that their vaccine is an “experimental gene therapy”.
So you’re wrong. Admit to it.
Answer: “it’s something that doesn’t exist at this point and is not really defined”.
Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.
I bolded it in my earlier post to you.
5,827 + 4245 != 9,245, and what about under 60 years old? 63%+45% != 100%. not sure what to exactly take away from this article.
And you continue to lie.
Moderna does not say that their product is an “experimental gene therapy” as you claimed. Moderna states that the FDA currently classifies it as such and that the FDA’s classification may carry with it negative public perception of their product. This is a document for investors. At no point in this document or any other does Moderna state that their product is - in fact - a gene therapy product.
Admit you were wrong.
ROFLMAO!!!
Remember, “Trust Govt. Officials” and “Trust the Science”
Except when it’s the FDA getting in the way of your immunity from liability.
Hey, good news for you though.
Bill and Melinda Gates are splitting up.
Now maybe you can marry a rich girl so you don’t have to scrape together pennies by trolling on FR.
Think you got a chance with her?
Oh, I know!!!
Moderna “IDENTIFIES” as a vaccine.
And it “IDENTIFIES” as one without side effects.
Tell me another, PharmBot.
Now explain the spike in deaths after the jab, peaking at 0-1 days post administration.
Oh, I know. It must be...McCluskey’s Disease.
Or Galloping Dandruff.
It can’t be the jab.
Because it “IDENTIFIES” as a vaccine without side effects.
Just like you “IDENTIFY” as an honest poster.
So you refuse to admit that you are wrong and that Moderna has never stated that their product is - in fact - a gene therapy?
If it’s the vaccine, then were are the thousands of doctors and medical examiners stating publicly that specific individuals they have examined have died from the vaccine? Why do they keep stating on official government documents (under penalty of law, loss of medical license, loss of career, potential prison time, etc.) that it was natural causes consistent with the person’s individual medical history?
I’m right. It is a gene therapy. Which is why their FEC form —which you lied and said I didn’t have—says they’re having a harder time with regulatory approval.
Remember, you’re the one preaching unconditional kissy-face acceptance of edicts from unelected, unaccountable bureaucrats. Not me.
You’re getting hoist on your petard so often, it’s like watching the cow jump over the MOOOOOOn. Get it?
It’s not the FEC. They aren’t hosting an election.
It’s the SEC.
I didn’t say you didn’t have it, I said I didn’t think you would post it because it doesn’t say what you claim. And you surprised my by posting the document that proves you were wrong when you claimed Moderna said their product is an “experimental gene therapy”. Which they didn’t.
Keep in mind that a huge number of people "had" this virus, showed very mild or no symptoms and therefore did not report it.
That huge number has not been factored into the survival rate. If it was, the percentage of survivors would be even higher.
Pull up each and every one of the documents that say so, on a case by case basis.
For all 3000+ deaths in VAERS, and for the 3000+ deaths in the US.
Then do the same for all the reported adverse effects.
You have LESS THAN zero credibility here.
...and your question just admitted the major premise. You lose.
Bravo! Everything you said is true.
Death certificates are not in VAERS. That’s not what the system is used for. VAERS records adverse events that happen within a specified time of receiving a vaccine. If you get a shingles vaccine today and get hit by a car tomorrow, the death is recorded - by law - in VAERS.
Just more BS from the phony pharma flack. He is really losing his touch. He used to be so much better at the beginning of this but that is probably because he got no pushback then because so little was known about the vaxes at that point.
194 million doses were of flu vaccine given in the last year; the majority went to senior citizens; 20 after vax deaths.
Of course authorities are not looking to determine that the vax caused any serious or deadly adverse effects. That would end the vaccine program.
Nature:
“These events illustrate how fiendishly challenging it is to prove that a medical problem following immunization — known as an adverse event — was caused by the vaccine itself. Public-health officials must strike a “delicate balance” when communicating the risk of rare side effects alongside the dangers of severe COVID-19, says vaccinologist Kathryn Edwards at Vanderbilt University School of Medicine in Nashville, Tennessee. Physicians worry about fuelling anti-vaccine movements that are already increasing vaccine hesitancy in some communities. At the same time, it is important not to dismiss the potential for rare but severe side effects until researchers can establish causality, A PROCESS THAT CAN TAKE YEARS.”
From page 70: Currently, mRNA is considered a gene therapy product by the FDA.
But Moderna "Identifies" as sugar and spice, and everything nice. With whipped cream on top.
Because they need the money, fear liability, and are having difficulty getting approval.
Which of the BigPharma groups do you fail at working for?
Despite the revelation that 80% of us have some form of T cell immunity already?
Why would you make as broad a statement as that?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.