[HandBasketHell]

It will require that McSally and other candidates, also file a petition for a writ of quo warranto if the same evidence supports their claims. It won't happen automatically. The writ must be requested, and then the "winning" side will be required to answer it. I expect more procedural nonsense like "laches", etc.

"Fraud vitiates all."

We will see if that basic legal argument applies to republicans, or if yet again there is going to be another double standard.

[Dr. Franklin]

"Fraud vitiates all."
We will see if that basic legal argument applies to republicans, or if yet again there is going to be another double standard.

The embarrassing point is that the writ of quo warranto was always possible after the election. So, for the courts to invoke laches, which is an equitable defense not a legal one, was Twilight Zone bizarro. It was the ultimate cop out. Now they either address the predictable result of elections that weren't conducted lawfully, or they rubber stamp the greatest election fraud in U.S. history.