Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: RightWingNutJob69
Even if they took Moscow, there was still a lot of land to conquer and General Winter.

Personally, I think Hitlers first and biggest mistake was not going south to seize the oil fields.

32 posted on 04/30/2021 6:34:03 AM PDT by dearolddad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies ]


To: dearolddad

The thing is, had Hitler taken Moscow, would Stalin have survived politically, and literally? I think there was a great chance he would have been deposed, and maybe more level heads would have abandoned Bolshevism.


34 posted on 04/30/2021 6:40:21 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: dearolddad; RightWingNutJob69
>>Even if they took Moscow, there was still a lot of land to conquer and General Winter.

> Personally, I think Hitlers first and biggest mistake was not going south to seize the oil fields.

It was a big country and factories had been moved east to the Urals. Taking Moscow wouldn't have meant the end of the war for Hitler any more than it had for Napoleon. But a lot of North/South communication ran through Moscow. If the Germans went south, their supply lines to the oil fields would have been vulnerable to attacks from the North. Some scholars think it would have served the Germans better to just take Moscow, driving a wedge through the middle of the country, and worry about the South later.

94 posted on 05/09/2021 7:32:33 AM PDT by x
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson