Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some indication in Pfizer's vaccine trial documentation that spread of adverse effects from vaccinated to unvaccinated possible
tghn.org ^ | 4/29/2021 | Pfizer

Posted on 04/29/2021 2:51:29 PM PDT by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last
To: Pollard

So the vaccinated sheep are going to kill the vaccine hesitancy crowd aka flyover country conservatives?

So what are these, Gain of Function Vaccines?

Pretty clever I suppose.
~~~~~~~~~~~

Unknown what the effect is, and which part of all this is intentionally meant to influence behavior.

I did read a physician’s analysis of the J&J and AstraZeneca in which he believed the use of adnovirus would render that vax airbornne after a sufficient number of people were vaccinated. The Adeno virus was crippled for vaccine use but the doctor believed those carrying the adeno virus (common cold) from the wild would be able to mix the genetics and voila - the vax would be carried airbornne.

Today’s article is the first I’ve read and I’m reminded that we have no idea what any of these vacc’s actually do. China did not use the live virus to make the genome that the US waited to receive from them. Then in January China said, “Here you go world, here’s the genome...” but they could not have accurately developed it using the technique they claim to use (predicted patches to missing pieces) because the virus has been declared a ‘novel’virus and therefore no genome sequence could be predicted for it.

So the US waited for a genome from China, that releaesed the virus in the first place, then use it, they claim, to create the virus (the pharmas admit no live virus was used - just the genome). And so a weaponized Fauci/NIH chose what spike protein their vax would produce and claim it’s the same one as the COvid virus produces, but that is impossible so....

WHO KNOWS?


61 posted on 04/29/2021 6:35:11 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: SheepWhisperer

A good reply. Your prayers are benefiting you in a good way.


62 posted on 04/29/2021 6:38:02 PM PDT by jonrick46 ( Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Pollard

What has been a mystery is why women who are vaxxed have had menstrual symptoms (believed to result from low platelet counts) and then when around unvaxxed, those unvaxxed women then develop the same symptoms.

Others have theorized the spontaneous loss of pregnancies experienced by vaxxed women means the resulting immunity vaccinated the mother against against the placenta itself, and the concern is the unvaxxed women will possibly have the same experience.


63 posted on 04/29/2021 6:38:16 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: jonrick46

And if this site bans me for calling evil people evil I’ll be gone. Good riddance. I’ll save the quarterly donations,v yet still read the site.

Interesting that you quote me but don’t address the blatant evil wishes of the one who plots evil against innocents.

Tells me EVERYTHING I need to know about you too.

Apologist


64 posted on 04/29/2021 6:39:23 PM PDT by SheepWhisperer (My enemy saw me on my knees, head bowed and thought they had won until I rose up and said Amen!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

I’m worried about ever needing a blood transfusion-and getting blood from someone vaccinated with one of the mRNA vaccines


65 posted on 04/29/2021 6:46:28 PM PDT by dkGba (God Bless America dkGba)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheepWhisperer

I didn’t read “the blatant evil wishes of the one who plots evil against innocents.” I just read you comment and was not liking the language. No matter how “evil” are people’s comments, it is better to influence them with good reason. That way we learn from each other.

I will go back to see what House Atreides wrote, and get more understanding.


66 posted on 04/29/2021 6:49:06 PM PDT by jonrick46 ( Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: SheepWhisperer

I just read your reaction to House of Atreides when he wrote:

“I’m going to ask my wife to hang out with her not-yet-vaccinated friends more.”

I think if you would have saw it for the sarcastic nature it was, that it is typical of the sarcasm you see on these boards. He didn’t say if his wife was vaccinated, but I interpreted it as she was, in the context of the sarcasm. His sarcasm was to have his wife do the exact opposite of what the trial documentation was interpreted to say.

House of Atreides was really saying that he disliked the interpretation of what the study said: That a vaccinated person who had adverse effects from the vaccine could spread that adverse effect to another, unvaccinated, person. After reading the study, is that what the study said? Maybe from reading what you learned, you could have pointed out where House of Atreides misread the study, instead of launching into a personal assault. The readers of this thread got no valuable information when you did that.


67 posted on 04/29/2021 7:24:52 PM PDT by jonrick46 ( Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: House Atreides
To call attention to yourself and your sign, consider wearing a highly reflective tin-foil hat at all times. I sincerely wish you success in avoiding those of us who have been vaccinated.

You haven't been vaccinated as evidenced by the "vaccinated" who still get sick with a coronavirus. You've been given an experimental treatment at best.

I'm glad you're going to keep 'roving' and others updated on all the other experimental treatments you've signed up for from here forward. Your body, your choice but mocking others like 'roving' for avoiding a treatment that the manufacturers have been indemnified for doesn't afford others the same belief.

68 posted on 04/29/2021 7:33:51 PM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dkGba

Hopefully, you can be prepared and store up your own blood (like for a planned surgery), prior to needing it...or, someone you know who hasn’t gotten the shots can donate to you.

Something to be concerned about, I agree.


69 posted on 04/29/2021 8:25:58 PM PDT by Jane Long (America, Bless God....blessed be the Nation 🙏🏻🇺🇸)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: Jane Long

And a nurse, herself!

I’ve read that 50 percent of the medical community is not volunteering for the authorized-but-unapproved “vaccine”.

I don’t know why she would do such a thing.

I think of the widespread birth defects caused by the german measles shot in the early 60’s — and that was an approved vaccine, supposedly.

Her fetus is an involuntary participant in a medical experiment.


70 posted on 04/29/2021 9:59:10 PM PDT by zipper (In their heart of hearts, all Democrats are communists.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-70 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson