Thought I’d share this with you guys. I’ve been hearing about how those vaccinated could effect the unvaccinated. It sounded a bit far fetched. But the info in this article is from an actual Pfizer report. The 2nd link is the Pfizer report. The first link discusses it.
The pfizer doc
https://media.tghn.org/medialibrary/2020/11/C4591001_Clinical_Protocol_Nov2020_Pfizer_BioNTech.pdf
😱😱
Thought I’d share this with you guys. I’ve been hearing about how those vaccinated could effect the unvaccinated. It sounded a bit far fetched. But the info in this article is from an actual Pfizer report.
the info in this article is from an actual Pfizer report. The 2nd link is the Pfizer report. The first link discusses it.
``````````````
The second link is the PROTOCOL, not the medical research report.
...........
10.4.1. Male Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
Male participants are eligible to participate if they agree to the following requirements during the intervention period and for at least 28 days after the last dose of study intervention, which corresponds to the time needed to eliminate reproductive safety risk of the study intervention(s):
• Refrain from donating sperm.
PLUS either:
• Be abstinent from heterosexual intercourse with a female of childbearing potential as their preferred and usual lifestyle (abstinent on a long-term and persistent basis) and agree to remain abstinent.
OR
• Must agree to use a male condom when engaging in any activity that allows for passage of ejaculate to another person.
• In addition to male condom use, a highly effective method of contraception may be considered in WOCBP partners of male participants (refer to the list of highly effective methods below in Section 10.4.4).
10.4.2. Female Participant Reproductive Inclusion Criteria
A female participant is eligible to participate if she is not pregnant or breastfeeding, and at least 1 of the following conditions applies:
• Is not a WOCBP (see definitions below in Section 10.4.3).
OR
• Is a WOCBP and using an acceptable contraceptive method as described below during the intervention period (for a minimum of 28 days after the last dose of study intervention). The investigator should evaluate the effectiveness of the contraceptive method in relationship to the first dose of study intervention.
The investigator is responsible for review of medical history, menstrual history, and recent sexual activity to decrease the risk for inclusion of a woman with an early undetected pregnancy.
...............
They want to eliminate including men and women who are /may become pregnant.
My mother (in her 80s) lives in an independent living facility and is refusing the vaccine (thank God!) But her friends have been rushing to take it. One of them is her very best friend, with whom she eats dinner almost every night. Two weeks ago, my mom came down with flu-like symptoms that came on very slowly with nausea for three or four days before finally going full-on stomach flu type stuff (vomiting, etc.), low grade fever, body aches all over, chills, the whole 9 yards. I had met with her for lunch the day before this all started and I noticed (I even checked my journal and I had mentioned it) that the day I had been with her and the following day, I had unexplained nausea that never materialized into anything. (I’m naturally empathic, so it made me wonder about that.) She is convinced that her friends are “shedding” virus from their “vaccines” and that she caught a form of it. She’s fine now. Anyone else heard anything like this? I seem to think she just caught a random stomach bug that’s going around.