So if even exposure to high levels of radiation doesn’t generate a significant increase in mutations then has there been sufficient time for humans to evolve from protozoa? Asking for a YEC friend.
well then, nukes are okay right?
/s
I remember reading, years ago, that nothing would grow in Hiroshima and Nagasaki for 96 years after the 1945 blasts.
And yet a year later the trees budded an sent up new sprouts proving the scientists wrong.
It was only 200,000 people. Nothing to worry about.
That’s correct. Subsequent generations are not affected. For example, a cow eats large amounts of cesium, but the cow lives. After the cesium washes down into the soil and away to lower places, the cow has a calf. The calf will grow up to be a steer or heifer that will make some fine and healthy steaks.
Same with fish. Cesium decays out quickly in fish. It’s okay to eat the next generation of fish.
Comic writers are highly disappointed.
The development in the 1950s of the standard of “too much” radiation employed a mathematical error.
Chernobyl, the “global disaster” that wasn’t.
It was a “local” disaster, VERY local. Sure some radiation went here and there, but what damage did it cause? NONE!
Chernobyl was OVERHYPED! Catastrophic predictions NEVER came to pass. You might even say “Hoax”. You know, the same leftists screaming today about climate change were screaming then about nuclear destruction and earth contamination.
The easiest way to confirm what I said is to look up the then and now photos of Hiroshima and Nagasaki.
Ground zero for the nuke is a PARK!