[fr_freak]

I did a quick Google search of some of the named doctors. They seem to be anti-vaccers in general.

Here's the problem with any attempt at serious discussion these days: two extreme poles are defined in any subject, and then people are pigeon-holed into one pole or the other. And I believe this is by design, a method to prevent any honest and useful discussion of ANYTHING.

With regards to the vaccine issue, it seems that the propagandists have managed to define the two poles as pro-vax or anti-vax. Even if you are someone who wholeheartedly accepted the value of every vaccine until the Chinese Kung Flu COVID crap, but now balk at the idea of experimental vaccines being disseminated globally, you are an "anti-vaxxer!!!! OMG!!!!" which is an emotionally pre-conditioned knee-jerk reaction specifically designed to discredit anyone who might dissent from the current experiental vaccine push.

Even before the Chinese Lung Herpes fiasco, there were many medical professionals who were uneasy about the sheer number and bundling of vaccines given to newborns today as compared to, say, 40 years ago, that might be contributing to medical issues, including autism. These medical professionals were not against vaccines as a whole, but only the manner in which they were administered, and yet we STILL saw cries of "anti-vaxxer! anti-vaxxer! OMGZZZZ!" everywhere, inclduing here on FR, because so many people have been dumbed-down to where they can only see one extreme or another. You are either on one team or the other and there is no middle ground.

This method of disruption of honest discourse is not limited to vaccines, by any means. I have seen it used against virtually every subject of substance.

[metmom]

Thank you.

Being suspicious of the government pushing a heretofore experimental treatment called a vaccine using EUA because they forbade the use of medications that could have and are shown to work, so they could get their EUA that they otherwise could not get, does not mean one is a blanket anti-vaxxer.

But never let the facts stop a good emotional broad brush false accusation of someone you disagree with to discredit them because you cannot debate them.

[HandyDandy]

I think the libs are stuck with having to take the experimental biological agent in order to avert being lumped in with anti-vaxxers who are obviously and only right wing conspiracy theorists. Who’s idea was it to lump the anti MRNA people with “anti-vaxxers” anyway? Someone is, once again, trying to control the narrative.