Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Capt. Tom

It’s the line’s choice, thus not an infringement of rights. Should it become an issue for enough travelers, some lines will be happy to find alternatives, such as a negative test. A government mandate which I could see the CDC, without authority, issuing is a major infringement. Clearly, at least for Caribbean, South and Central America and Mexico, alternative departure ports are a necessary diversification. And they’d be foolish to abandon them when the CDC relents. This is clearly a political issue, and something any international company has to consider when operating here. Obviously most important for cruise lines, where, though they generate considerable revenue for embarkation ports, with a few exceptions don’t operate within the US.


12 posted on 04/23/2021 8:39:56 AM PDT by SJackson (Whom will insane lust for power spare, if it dares violate ties of kin & friendship? Dominic Mancini)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: SJackson
It’s the line’s choice, thus not an infringement of rights.

I agree, because you don't "NEED" to go on a cruise.

Viking Cruises will not allow any passengers under 18 to be onboard for a Cruise.
Is that an infringement of rights ?

Laws will vary country to country.-Tom

19 posted on 04/23/2021 9:30:18 AM PDT by Capt. Tom (.It's COVID 2021 - The Events, not us, are still in charge -Tom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson