So yes, it’s 6 people in their selected population. And what is the normal background rate for that particular group? And can the results be seen among an actually significant number (tens of thousands - not <500) of persons?
I’m not saying it isn’t worth looking into - it is - but rather than it’s not significant or worthy of panic on its own.
However, 1 in 82 is just a slight bit different than "one in a million."
This is information the government media complex isn't going to willing tell their viewers. Fraudchi certainly wont offer it without a fight.
Information, is good. Helps make an....informed decision.
Apparently the nominal rate is something like 3 cases per 100,000 for adults under 70. So 6 out of 491 is a significant increase.