Famous Harvard-trained psychiatrist calls for ‘moratorium’ on COVID vaccines

Life Site News ^ | 04/15/2021 | Pete Baklinski

[semimojo]

We are being misled. The numbers are greatly underreported.

You may believe that and if so feel free to make that case.

My problem is when what is reported is misrepresented to deceive FReepers.

[goodnesswins]

True...sooo...in 50 years young children will be getting 30 or more vax by age 3??? It just seems we are on the wrong track...maybe the US should start checking every ones vit d3 level like Sweden, (I think). I don’t care if people do or do not get the vax...but the PUSH seems unusual.

[MadMax, the Grinning Reaper]

Interesting! If this is the same Peter Breggin I saw and photographed at a Maoist Progressive Labor Party protest at the circle of Union Station in DC in the Spring of 1971 (I was a street journalist for a major conservative paper), then he sure has changed in 50 years (slow learner?).

Interesting what pops up in your files and photo collections if they are well organized and your memory is still intact.

Hope he has become more rational and moderate. We need doctors who are not as crazy as their patients.

[goodnesswins]

AND...as Irish Eyes said...this IS an EXPERIMENTAL vax. That is troubling.

[Responsibility2nd]

Thank you for the kind words.

[cgbg]

I am relying on the circle of people I and my family know.

Those who have tested positive have had minimal symptoms, except for one relative who was in serious condition in a hospital and then contracted Covid which was blamed for his death.

Life is risk all around—but the vaccines scare me more than the disease in this case. I just do not trust the folks pushing the vaccines—they are trying way too hard for my comfort.

[dsc]

“We are being misled.”

That is the only proposition here in which I have great confidence.

We know that leftwads, for the most part, favor population control and reduction.

Why, then, would they react to a “pandemic” by rushing to produce vaccines and push them on all of us? Wouldn’t a “pandemic” be a great opportunity to strike a blow against the “population explosion?” Why would they want to protect us against the dreaded ‘rona?

Why are they pushing these vaccines so hard? I read the other day that leftists are more likely to receive the virus than normal people, so they could leave us to die in droves while protecting their own tribe.

[Jan_Sobieski]

Age sometimes brings wisdom.

[Flaming Conservative]

Apples and oranges. All those vaccines were fully tested for years; the Covid19 vaccines have not been.

[definitelynotaliberal]

Those vax poisons have only begun creating extreme disease in people. Long term may be devastating. I really get sick thinking about what is going to happen. The worse part is that the vaxes don’t even stop covid.

I'm in the same boat. I can't imagine what kind of immunodeficiency cascade is coming our way.

[Nextrush]

“Fear Porn” works both ways in the Pro-Vaxx and Anti-Vaxx camps IMHO.

The vaccines were rushed creating more side effects including deaths that would not normally have occurred.

That is a reality in this worldwide game of “Lifeboat”...

[ransomnote]

Explosion? When adverse reactions affect 0.0008% of vaccinated people?

~~~~~~~~~~~

The death stats the CDC collected and reported for "Covid-19" are wildly inflated and many deaths are falsely assigned to "Covid-19" based on absurd CDC 'new rules' and fake PCR results. Compare that the the explosion of adverse events for the experimental fake Covid vaccines.

According to a study done by Harvard (at the commission of our own government), less than 1% of all adverse reactions to vaccines are actually submitted to the National Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS) - read page 6 at the link above.

While the problems with VAERS have not been fixed (as you can read about in this letter to the CDC), at the time of this writing VAERS reports over (updated by ransomnote 4/16/2021 to be 2,566 deaths from the current covid vaccines, as well as close to 76,770 adverse reactions.

And those numbers don't include (what is currently) an additional 578 cases of Bell's Palsy.

If those numbers are aroud 1% of the total adverse reactions, that equates to somewhere around 256,600 deaths from the vaccines to date, and a ridiculous number of adverse reactions. The risks of ADE are documented for mRNA technology, but not quantified for Covid-19 'vaccines', so more adverse reactions and deaths have yet to be reported.

Still, the number of reports of death for Covid-19 vaccinations in VAERS during the first few months of administration are already greater than the number of reported deaths in VAERS for all other vaccines for the last 14 years.

The data below reflects approx 25% of actual reports received by the CDC as of 4/16/2021.

 

 Information above excerpted from:

18 Reasons I Won't Be Getting a Covid Vaccine
Deconstructing Conventional ^ | April 5, 2021 | Christian Elliot

Posted on 4/11/2021, 11:20:47 AM by \/\/ayne

 

[missnry]

I’ve been suffering from Covid for over a month now. My symptoms were moderate but are mild now; fever averaging 100.2 and shortness of breath.

Just out of curiosity did you at any time take Ivermectin or Budesonide in your recovery period?

[Responsibility2nd]

No I didn’t. What made a tremendous difference in my recovery was an infusion of monoclonal antibodies.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bamlanivimab

[missnry]

an infusion of monoclonal antibodies.

Interesting... and they just revoked the emergency use authorization of it in April.

[Responsibility2nd]

I saw that. Yesterday in fact. So it seems I was part of a clinical trial and they were not impressed with the overall results.

Be that as it may my symptoms went from moderate to mild immediately after the infusion. From my point of view, the antibodies worked.

[SgtHooper]

“But you know the sources of the adverse events data make it clear that those events aren’t necessarily the result of the shot.”

What is the matter with you!? Do you have inside sources to these numbers? Do have valid sources that definitively prove your side of the argument? Of course you don’t!! You simply drink the koolaide published by these sources as fact! Have you learned nothing over the past 3-4 years? Have you learned nothing about the FDA over the past few decades?

[semimojo]

 Do have valid sources that definitively prove your side of the argument?

Yes, I do. My argument is adverse events reported to VAERS and the European databases are not necessarily the result of the vaccines.

The CDC, which produces the data all these articles rely on, says

"Specifically, a report to VAERS does not mean that a vaccine caused an adverse event."

When the source of the data tells you what it represents it's definitive.

And when people who know what VAERS really is post articles that misrepresent it I consider that to be deception.

[Vaduz]

Famous Harvard-trained psychiatrist...

Some words just make me real nervous at times.

[Cathi]

250,000+ “adverse events” according to the CDC. But, not likely to be acknowledged as “caused by vaccine” because this is the WHO (World Health Organization) parameter for causation:

“WHO’s causality assessment algorithm”

“Only reactions that have previously been acknowledged in epidemiological studies to be caused by the vaccine are classified as a vaccine-product-related-reaction. New serious adverse reactions that emerge post-licensure “are labelled as ‘coincidental deaths/events’ or ‘unclassifiable.’”