[Republican Wildcat]

No, that's not what he said. You cut off the other sentence to make it appear he said something other than what he said, so you could respond to something that wasn't said. Using the same tactic again.

That's called being dishonest, bagster.

[bagster]

That's called being dishonest, bagster.

Wrong again, pettifogger.

Why mention that she had allergies if not to imply the allergies had something to do with her death.

And if that is so, then it was in reaction to the vax. Ipso facto, the vax cause her death, by his own 'logic'.

Your petty semantical tactic will not avail you. I know perfectly well what I say and why.

Always.