Replies

Wow, I don’t think I’ve seen a subject that has generated as much vitriol on FR like the COVID19 “vaccination” question. Now, it seems we are divided, “vaxxers” versus “anti-vaxxers”. These labels are incorrect. I am not an “anti-vaxxer”. I have had many vaccines throughout my life.

Yes, well there isn't really a Covid vaccine. What exists are experimental treatments that don't prevent anyone from getting Covid or spreading it.

I am definitely not going to get one of the current COVID19 until more is learned about them.

Right, the long term effects are unknown. Some may cause sterility in women of child-bearing age.

My goodness people, they are experimental. Why on earth would anyone would subject themselves to possible adverse reactions? Especially since they provide questionable protection against a virus that is not very deadly (or harmful for that matter) for the vast majority of people. Isn’t the rate of people that survive with no lasting problems around 99%?!

Why would anyone want young children taking such an experimental treatment, since they are the most resistant to it? The actual statistics on how many people have died, and their demographics, are being obscured. It appears to be only slightly more deadly than an average flu season. Since it's completely treatable, why do we need a "vaccine"? Answer: Follow the money.

Precisely.

They are quick to label anyone who dare questions, or posts facts about these experimental agents, as anti-vaxxers.

Great posts, from both of you.