By making more of them?
Colonization was a net plus for the entire world.
Civilization was brought to places where the populations were already involved in war, slavery, and genocide.
If there was any downside to colonization, it is that it was terminated prematurely in too many places.
Decolonizing the curriculum is a progressive initiative that will help poor students and in particular, those of color to understand their position in the current world, how they got there and why they must remain there. It will clarify why they must serve their masters in the Democratic party and teach them to use verbal communications that were almost lost in the educational system but are being taught again to make their educational experience more meaningful. Phrases like, “burn, baby burn”, “the honorable Elijah Muhammud”, and (newer), “it takes a village.”
Yet it is important to understand why many young people are more attracted to social justice-based decolonization demands... because BLM Co-Founder owns a Million Dollar Home.
Would they be removing leftism, which originated in the West, from the curriculum?
It’s not about helping anyone. It’s about liberals feeling good about themselves, which means feeling morally superior without doing anything of any substance.
Bkmk
Whether we are all rich or poor is irrelevant. We will be equal.
Except of course for the management. They will be quite wealthy and unequal.
It won’t. It will just entrench the White Liberals pushing this crap deeper into power.
The same way that blowing up highways will end racism.
“All that intellectual stuff is like, HARD, dude!” /s;)
Think Participation Trophy, and expand from there.