HOWEVER, do you deny it is accurate to say that if HCQ and Ivermectin were approved therapeutics for CoVID, then the FDA's EUA for their fake "vaccine" would go up in smoke, as ransomnote is contending?
If someone is denying me a therapeutic that's cheaper than a good bottle of wine "because reasons", then I tend to get suspicious.
Couple that with the lying @ssclown hobbit Fauchnocchio, then I get REAL suspicious.
Well, I think its a red herring. We now know that HCQ simply does not work (May be a weak prophylactic) and Ivermectin is imperfect at best. So its not entirely an on point question.
However, one common opinion we share...I think Fauci is not a lying @ssclown. I find him to be a maliciously stupid Dumb F**k power hungry demon.
HOWEVER, do you deny it is accurate to say that if HCQ and Ivermectin were approved therapeutics for CoVID, then the FDA’s EUA for their fake “vaccine” would go up in smoke, as ransomnote is contending?
If someone is denying me a therapeutic that’s cheaper than a good bottle of wine “because reasons”, then I tend to get suspicious.
Couple that with the lying @ssclown hobbit Fauchnocchio, then I get REAL suspicious.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Yes. The terms of an EUA require that no other treatment be available, and the situation is an emergency.
Withholding these medications from patients created both an emergency (needless death) and the fake impression that no other drugs were available.