Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: alexander_busek
When the date is after Christ's birth, the "A.D." precedes the number, e.g., A.D. 43 = "In the year of Our Lord (anno domini), 43."

In the first millennium, the year was often preceded by an I, since Jesus was spelled Iesus, following Ancient Greek Ἰησοῦς (Iēsoûs) since the letter J didn't gain currency until the 1500s.

Old building had cornerstones with the date in this format, e.g. a building erected in 347 A.D. would be marked I347.

Which caused an apparent missing millennium in construction, as it was read as 1347, and therefore it looked like nothing survived from before 1000 A.D.

49 posted on 04/12/2021 10:01:58 AM PDT by null and void (The media decides what news you can see and NOT SEE. But don't you dare call 'em Not-Sees)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies ]


To: null and void
In A.D. 347, the Anno Domini system of dating had not yet been invented. So no one would have used it--and they would not have used Arabic numerals on a cornerstone. If they tried to date it they would have counted from the foundation of Rome (753 B.C.) or used the names of the consuls of the year.
52 posted on 04/12/2021 12:10:19 PM PDT by Verginius Rufus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson