[gas_dr]

Yes because when you hide behind science you are hiding behind facts. It is at best distinction without difference, however this BLOGGER has written his opinion and limited debate precisely because he cannot handle science. Thus, he is an antivaxxer without the first concept of how the scientific process works. But he just doesn’t want to address this....

[\/\/ayne]

Your statement indicates you do not understand the phrase: I am more than happy to correspond with you if... You make your points using sound logic and don't hide behind links or the word "science." Yet, I certainly think you are capable of understanding the phrase.

That's an interesting study in bias.

[bagster]

Yes because when you hide behind science you are hiding behind facts.

Science is never 'settled'. I recall when 'gas doctors' gave you a slug of whiskey and a piece of leather to bite down on.

That was the science of the day. 'Facts' subject to change.

Scientists are not gods.

And neither are doctors.

[Apple Pan Dowdy]

” Yes because when you hide behind science you are hiding behind facts.”

Did you read his blog article, or are you just jumping on the “science” thing without really understanding what he is saying? The author said, “… don’t hide behind the word ‘science’.”

In other words, don’t pretend that because you use the word “science” that doing so automatically lends credibility to what you are saying.

This author is a professional health and nutrition coach. He believes in science and bases his life work on scientific facts and research. He has meticulously laid out scientific reasoning backing up his decision to not get this fake vaccine.