Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: jonrick46

By definition it is not an airborne virus, but that aside, The U.S. had its first case on Jan. 21st, Brazil had its first confirmed case on Feb. 26th. Not much difference there. Especially when you consider how much misinformation was being thrown around by China, the WHO and other “experts.”

Now, over a year later for both countries (with one month’s difference), 9% of the U.S. population has had the virus and only 5.5% of Brazil’s population has been infected.

Maybe it was their superior medical infrastructure! /s


117 posted on 04/11/2021 7:37:17 PM PDT by TigersEye (Will the Younger Dryas Impact you? )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: TigersEye

The U.S. has a larger population of Chinese than Brazil. Many went to the city of Wuhan to celebrate the Chinese New Year and brought back the virus. I don’t think as many brought back the virus to Brazil. New York City contains the largest ethnic Chinese population outside of Asia, totaling 682,265. New York has been described as the epicenter of the virus infection in the U.S. Los Angeles has more than 66,782 ethnic Chinese and San Jose has 63,434 ethnic Chinese. The Seattle-Tacoma area has 45,000 ethnic Chinese population. Brazil has about 350,000 ethnic Chinese. Do you think this has something to do with the degree of infection in the U.S.?


120 posted on 04/11/2021 10:22:37 PM PDT by jonrick46 ( Leftnicks chase illusions of motherships at the end of the pier.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 117 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson