And who better to reckanize a member of his own tribe.
“...I know, you have to tell people that we have samples etc., but honest researchers can’t lay hands on it....”
**************************************************************
You show me a legitimate researcher who cannot obtain “live” cultures of the SARS-CoV-2 virus (the one that causes COVID-19 disease) and I’LL SHOW YOU AN INEPT MORON. Sorry, but that’s the truth.
And who better to reckanize a member of his own tribe.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
ransomnote: To anyone following along, this issue has percolated beneath the surface of many articles I've read by researchers, virologists, and doctors.
I've read many researchers who have said that when they ask for an isolated sample of the virus, they are told by CDC that no such samples are available 'at this time.' Gosh, if only researchers could have had isolated samples from the start, we could have accurate research, other non-toxic vaccine development, and drug trials etc.
This telling 'unavailability' is hotly debated by people who shriek that isolated samples are everywhere, researchers have it, the CDC sent a notice saying samples are available etc! (such claims always have an exclamation point).EndNote1
And yet, researchers continue(d) to be told 'unavailable.'
So I believe China never gave its targets (e.g., us) isolated samples of the virus they weaponized, nor the accurate genome sequence of that virus.
Researchers who have electron microscopy images and other 'hard research' were either given the equivalent of a 'press packet' of images, models by China, are actually trusted by China (!) not to share information or reveal content which indicates it was engineered by China, or they have taken the time to isolate their own samples.
Some of our researchers or western researchers have figured out a sort of 'family tree' of viral strains that led to Covid-19 as China tweaked the recipe for "Gain of Function" courtesy of funding from Anthony Fauci.
The virus does exist, it's just not what China says it is, not where the PCR says it is, and not what the drug manufacturers 'product' is designed to defeat.
As a result of this "isolated samples are not available"/"Yes they are!" struggle, some researchers have apparently decided to double down by stating flatly that the virus does not exist. They seem to want the 'other side' to put up or shut up. "Give me a sample or admit it doesn't exist."
To cover exposed backsides (an insufficient metaphor when one is talking about crimes against humanity), I've seen research in pub med (NIH Database of accepted research) completed around fall of 2020 giving the whole 'new' idea of basing vaccination development on genome sequences, instead of the actual virus, a pathetic thumbs up. They are preparing to refute objections to their inexcusable acctions.
REFERENCES BELOW:
1. https://freerepublic.com/focus/news/3944996/posts
"Has the existence of “the Virus” been established according to a universally acknowledged set of scientific procedures that must be observed to establish the existence of any and all other viruses?
From the sounds of it, the answer is a resounding no.
Dr. Tom Cowan, Dr. Andrew Kaufman, and Sally Fallon Morell, are among those who have noted in a paper published last year that in demonstrating the existence of a new virus, samples must, firstly, be taken from the blood, phlegm, or other secretions of hundreds of people exhibiting symptoms that are “unique and specific enough to characterize an illness.”
Then, “without mixing these samples with ANY tissue or products that also contain genetic material, the virologist macerates, filters, and ultracentrifuges, i.e. purifies the specimen.” This, the authors explain, is a “common virology technique, done for decades to isolate bacteriophages [viruses that infect bacteria and reproduce within them] and so-called giant viruses [a virus larger than typical bacteria].”
Thirdly, once virologists perform this procedure, they are then able to “demonstrate with electron microscopy thousands of identically sized and shaped particles.” The latter are “the isolated and purified virus.”
Fourthly, upon determining the purity of these particles, virologists are able to examine their “structure, morphology, and chemical composition [.]”
Fifthly, “the genetic makeup” of the particles [the virus] “is characterized by extracting the genetic material directly from” them and “using genetic-sequencing techniques” that have long been in existence. They are told they can have isolated samples of the virus and when they ask, they are told samples are 'unavailable'. Some have decided to push back on the unavailability of isolated samples of the virus by declaring something equivalent to "The virus doesn't exist! PROVE ME WRONG!" Here's an example: