Posted on 04/09/2021 2:09:56 PM PDT by ransomnote
Amen.
A very good and moral individual. Watch how the MSM tries to stifle this MAJOR executive. Helped by the very bastards inside Pfizer who bilked our government out of billions for both development and “distribution” of a mRNA “vaccine” that is NOT a true vaccine.
This man is an expert, and there are many experts (at Johns Hopkins, for example— MAJOR world experts) who are pointing out the HUGE LIE. As Pfizer pursues a 12-15 year old age APPROVAL (so they can sell more vaccine that cost them next to nothing to make/distribute)— CHILDREN do not NEED to be vaccinated (09.999% survival with natural immunity antibodies. See again, Johns Hopkins). This is a deceptive at best marketing move... and evil at its worst.
Wow! Finally someone steps up to the plate.
thanks...’noted
How long will this good doctor be alive? He’s battling evil forces.
God Help Us.
and pfizer’s animal spinoff Zoetis, who recently opened up another facility in China, will sell you pet insurance.
bookmark
Prayers up for Dr. Yeadon!
Given the number of vaccine hesitant doctors and scientists who have died in the last 10 years, i suspect he is on someone’s “Arkancide” list
Big Gov/Pharma doesn’t seem to have a problem administering it to pregnant and lactating women either. We know what they think about the elderly and disabled. Mortality in the US was up 23% in 2020. These were the most vulnerable in our population - due to a poorly managed - by design - Covid response.
The safeguards that societal institutions used to have that protected vulnerable citizens are no longer operative.
Sheeple do as they are told and led, they will continue to take the vaccine no matter what....all in the name of COVID, Humanity, etc.
Or by taking it.
Bump
how could Pfizer, and Xi, and FauXi design
the CDC-FauXi-”Vaccine” BEFORE the CDC-FauXi-GOF-virus
appeared????
GOP = Gain of Function,
you know, changing the spike protein,
and adding those 4 HIV segments for the CDC
to spread AIDs,
and the circs. Circ-DNA is in it, too.
Time to give FauXi and the CDC new NObel prizes
for their blowing up the entire World.
This assertion is a stretch. First, a sequence of required subsequent vaccines will guarantee the drug companies a fixed income into the future. There's a "benign" explanation which does not require a depopulation scenario.
Second, a sequence of required subsequent vaccines will keep the boot on the necks of all citizens. That will be enough to keep politicians onboard. The control and the kickbacks from the drug companies would provide enough explanation.
For my part, I do not trust the "vaccines" due to the rapid development and the use of the m-RNA technology, which has not been tested on humans previously.
Yet Fauci, the CDC, etc. are all silent when telling the public it's safe. How can you have informed consent when risks are purged from all media and the medical establishment hides research proving the risks?
IN the US, they are testing the Covid vax on 12 year olds, and the CDC's webpage advises pregnant women to weigh the risks/benefits, and only provides the benefits and none of the documented risk.
For reference, research demonstrating the vaccines have a significant risk of sensitizing you to having a more serve case of Covid than you would if not vaccinated:
Timothy Cardozo 1, Ronald Veazey 2
Affiliations expand
Free PMC article
Abstract
Aims of the study: Patient comprehension is a critical part of meeting medical ethics standards of informed consent in study designs. The aim of the study was to determine if sufficient literature exists to require clinicians to disclose the specific risk that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus.
Methods used to conduct the study: Published literature was reviewed to identify preclinical and clinical evidence that COVID-19 vaccines could worsen disease upon exposure to challenge or circulating virus. Clinical trial protocols for COVID-19 vaccines were reviewed to determine if risks were properly disclosed.
Results of the study: COVID-19 vaccines designed to elicit neutralising antibodies may sensitise vaccine recipients to more severe disease than if they were not vaccinated. Vaccines for SARS, MERS and RSV have never been approved, and the data generated in the development and testing of these vaccines suggest a serious mechanistic concern: that vaccines designed empirically using the traditional approach (consisting of the unmodified or minimally modified coronavirus viral spike to elicit neutralising antibodies), be they composed of protein, viral vector, DNA or RNA and irrespective of delivery method, may worsen COVID-19 disease via antibody-dependent enhancement (ADE). This risk is sufficiently obscured in clinical trial protocols and consent forms for ongoing COVID-19 vaccine trials that adequate patient comprehension of this risk is unlikely to occur, obviating truly informed consent by subjects in these trials.
Conclusions drawn from the study and clinical implications: The specific and significant COVID-19 risk of ADE should have been and should be prominently and independently disclosed to research subjects currently in vaccine trials, as well as those being recruited for the trials and future patients after vaccine approval, in order to meet the medical ethics standard of patient comprehension for informed consent.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Pasted from <https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/>
What’s Adam Curry’s Freeper handle?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.