Reports in VAERS do NOT indicate that a vaccine caused the event. Reposts in VAERS do NOT indicate that a vaccine did NOT cause the event. But very often, common sense does.
Question: Does CDC/VAERS have motive to not call obvious reactions to the vax actual reactions?
What would happen if they reported the actual effects as actual effects?
What adverse effect might that have on the vax rollout, the pharma companies, and the entire covid industry?
How would the derp state politicians making their power moves under the cover of this 'scamdemic/fauxvax' debacle be affected?
And would all you fearbro vaxxers lose your VIP licenses have to go back to posting cat videos?
Okay, that was more than one question. You may take an additional ten minutes.
"Question: Does CDC/VAERS have motive to not call obvious reactions to the vax actual reactions?"Anaphylaxis is a serious reaction. It can be life-threatening if left untreated. Yet the CDC had no issue calling out dozens of cases with it for Pfizer and Moderna. And the NIH had no issue announcing a study into the root cause of the reactions. So this insinuation (there's that word again!) that they're hiding any serious reactions to the vaccines? Doesn't hold much water.
And still no evidence to support this idea that somehow all these events are being suppressed. If they were, the doctors and medical examiners doing the actual investigations would be speaking out. Unless the claim is that every doctor in every area of the country are all "in" on this suppression campaign together. And the families of all the supposed vaccine victims; all "in" on the conspiracy as well?
What's that leave something like 329,999,900 all engaged in a massive conspiracy to fool the remaining 100 of you who aren't "in" on it?