Migrants are Islam’s ‘eye’ on the West

American Thinker ^ | 5 Apr, 2021 | Raymond Ibrahim

[MtnClimber]

Rather than giving something back to those Western nations taking them in, Muslims willingly residing in the West are exhorted to hate, disavow, cajole, and spy on their benefactors.

Not only are Muslims living in the West supposed to hate their “infidel” host nations and neighbors; they are supposed to spy on them by serving as Islam’s “eye” on the West.

As discussed here, numerous online fatwas -- that is, decrees written by authoritative Muslim scholars (ulema), appearing on respected Islamic websites -- insist that Islamic law (shari‘a) requires Muslims living in the West to maintain “enmity and hatred” for their new homeland and its inhabitants. This applies equally to migrant refugees; they are duty bound to hate and be disloyal to those nations welcoming them in and providing them with free food, shelter, and healthcare -- so say the learned sheikhs of Islam.

Another fatwa, authored by the late Sheikh Muhammad ibn al-Uthaymeen -- deemed a “giant of conservative Islam” -- offers more precise, and disturbing, conditions for any Muslim who lives in the West.

Published by the well-regarded Muslim website, IslamWay.net, and titled in translation (all translations in this article my own), “What Is the Ruling for Living in the Lands of Infidels,” it, too, states that, along with “preserving and upholding his Islam,” the “first condition” for any Muslim who lives among non-Muslims is that he/she has “enmity and hatred for the infidels, staying far from their loyalty and love -- for loyalty and love for them contradicts the faith.”

[MtnClimber]

Islam and leftism seem to be driven by envy/jealousy. When individuals or societies excel outside of these totalitarian systems it shines a spotlight on the failure of those systems. That seems to be why both have a goal of world domination where everyone is dragged down to their level and there is nothing for them to envy anymore. Both systems are fellow travelers striving for the same goal and some (especially the left) think they can team up to take over the world, but they are totally incompatible with each other. I wonder if the two groups ever stop to wonder what the other has planned for them if they achieve their goal?

[ByteMercenary]

dittoes #2 - a very good statement. I have long felt that the leftists are very much like the muslim. The only difference seems to be that ‘death’ is not one of the leftists bargaining chips - yet.

Our focus on the southern invasion should not detract from the fact that the muslim invasion from abroad continues and the muslim that are already infesting our communities are breeding like field rats.

The logic that approves the diluting of our society with the cancer of islam totally escapes me.

Diversity and perversity are not societal strengths.

[a fool in paradise]

75% of muslims in America are first generation immigrants.

[upchuck]

Zeroing in on the word migrants in the headline, I wonder what Mr. Ibrahim means?

1. Criminal invaders to our country?

2. Illegal immigrants to our country?

3. Folks entering our country following official rules?

4. Something else?

[MtnClimber]

I think he means islamic followers migrating to non-islamic countries by any method.