Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: gas_dr

They are not attempting to prove causation which is why despite 3 months of vaccine administration with 2,509 VAERS after vax deaths and 205,000 reported VAERS adverse events they have not established any causation for any of them.

It is very difficult to prove a vaccine caused the effect which is why they rely on “looking for patterns.” Autopsies are rarely conducted and as medical examiners have stated you cannot determine a vaccine caused a death unless it occurs immediately after injection (anaphylaxis)

“The actual complications even if we assume these to be actually complications is vanishingly small compared to other therapeutics.”

That is absolutely untrue and the VAERS data going back for decades makes that clear. They have never had even a fraction of the 205,000 VAERS for any other vaccine. These numbers are historic.

The best way to measure the vaccine’s contribution to after vax death is to compare the results from this vaccine to previous vaccines and, in fact, in VAERS recently released Standard Operating Procedures they actually spell that out “Perform comparative analysis with other vaccines (e.g., compare frequencies and proportions with influenza vaccine) • Analyze reporting rates and compare reporting rates with other vaccines or background rates.”

Here are the comparative vaccine numbers:

Flu vaccine: 1/1/2020 - 3/11/2021 (covers 64 weeks) Over 200 million doses administered

12,491 adverse effects reported to VAERS; 159 deaths. 66% of senior citizens get a flu shot. Adults 18-64 Years Old Least Likely to Get Flu Shots (35.7%)

Covid vaccine: 12/20/2020 - 3/19/2021 (covers 12 weeks)
Over 140 million doses administered

205,000 adverse effects reported to VAERS; 2,509 deaths.

Data indicates that 1/3 of the deaths after covid vax occurs in the first 48 hrs. post vaccine.

https://twitter.com/birb_k/status/1376152228268888069/photo/1

Prophylactic vaccines are given to healthy people. If they kill or seriously harm people who were not likely to contract the virus to begin with and would be expected to recover even if they did then they are not a satisfactory solution

By the way, just as an aside, I read an interesting article from 2017 about the new mRNA technology. The author was part of the development and very upbeat about the prospects for the tech. But, he specifically made the point that it would be used first in a disease like cancer because of the significant adverse effects risk which is acceptable in a fatal disease, but would never be approved by the FDA for a prophylactic vaccine. Fast forward 3 years and the pandemic and it is being used despite significant adverse effect risk; not to mention unknown at this point long term risk.

My advice to anyone who wants to get a clear picture of the deaths after the covid vax should go to the VAERS Wonder site and pull up the deaths and read the specifics. I have read hundreds of them...very sad


18 posted on 04/02/2021 7:20:35 PM PDT by Cathi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: Cathi

This is a self reporting database that itself says it does not require any actual correlation. It also bears that influenza vaccines are not as politicized as this vaccine. As such there are likely to be far more reports.

As a clinician I can unequivocally state that after looking at the data, what are considered severe reactions as a percentage of 100M doses is vanishingly small.


19 posted on 04/02/2021 7:29:59 PM PDT by gas_dr (Trial lawyers AND POLITICIANS are Endangering Every Patient in America: INCLUDING THEIR LIBERTIES)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson