WHO ignores significant data, including several large clinical trials, while claiming insufficient evidence to recommend the use of ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19....
....because there is a) NOT enough money in it and b) if you PREVENT China virus.....there is NO NEED for the WHO/FRAUDci developed/associated mNRA/experimental ‘vaccines’.
WHO ignores significant data, including several large clinical trials, while claiming insufficient evidence to recommend the use of ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19....
....because there is a) NOT enough money in it and b) if you PREVENT China virus.....there is NO NEED for the WHO/FRAUDci developed/associated mNRA/experimental ‘vaccines’.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’ll add c) because if they approved Ivermectin or any other drug, they could never have implemented their vaccines. EUA requires that no other treatments be available - hence, the WHO and CDC let people die by denying them treatments until they could force their ‘vaccines’ on people. People still report being told when ill, “Go home and come back if you require hospitalization.”
Ivermectin (in use since the 80’s) and HCQ (in use 60 years for chronic patients like lupus) are fully FDA approved with good safety records and the CDC took the extra step of specifically prohibiting off-label use (letting doctors prescribe it for illnesses not specified when off label use is normally up to the physician.
They leveraged pharmacies and pharmacists not to fill prescriptions - I read content where they overarching agency over pharmacy practice warned sternly that to fill such a prescription would mark the pharmacists as unprofessional and subject them to additional oversight over such concerning behavior.
The CDC could have granted time tested safe medications like HCQ and Ivermectin an Emergency Use Authorization so that people didn’t have to face covid without treatment.
What would the death toll for Covid be like if you were allowed treatment? How many other illnesses in the US would be declared a ‘pandemic’ if all treatment were denied to lay the groundwork for a fake vaccine a year or two down the road?
So there’s a D) the WHO/CDC ignored significant data, including large clincial trials, in order to drive up the death toll to meet the second criteria for granting faux ‘vaccines’ an EUA. There has to be an emergency - people dying in significant numbers. If they had allowed available, FDA approved drugs to be administered as soon as the person became ill, the death toll would align with seasonal flu fatalities - no lockdowns, no masks, no dangerous biowarfare agents to label “vaccines”