Posted on 04/02/2021 9:37:51 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
Ping for your interest
WHO ignores significant data, including several large clinical trials, while claiming insufficient evidence to recommend the use of ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19....
....because there is a) NOT enough money in it and b) if you PREVENT China virus.....there is NO NEED for the WHO/FRAUDci developed/associated mNRA/experimental ‘vaccines’.
Well now, if the WHO recommends it only be used for clinical trials, then to be sure it should be used as a front line treatment. Rumor has it that it can wipe our all their covid mutants! 👏👏🤣 Which is why they want to limit it’s use.
How DARE you print something here that may upset the resident medical gasbags here!
[[“The latest guidance from WHO ignores several large clinical trials where ivermectin was proven to prevent mortality by more than 68%.”]]
Hmm, that % number sure has dropped since early reports on ivermectin. Last I knew it was approved 85% or so effective, with it reaching near 95%+ if taken every week
WHO ignores significant data, including several large clinical trials, while claiming insufficient evidence to recommend the use of ivermectin to prevent and treat COVID-19....
....because there is a) NOT enough money in it and b) if you PREVENT China virus.....there is NO NEED for the WHO/FRAUDci developed/associated mNRA/experimental ‘vaccines’.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
I’ll add c) because if they approved Ivermectin or any other drug, they could never have implemented their vaccines. EUA requires that no other treatments be available - hence, the WHO and CDC let people die by denying them treatments until they could force their ‘vaccines’ on people. People still report being told when ill, “Go home and come back if you require hospitalization.”
Ivermectin (in use since the 80’s) and HCQ (in use 60 years for chronic patients like lupus) are fully FDA approved with good safety records and the CDC took the extra step of specifically prohibiting off-label use (letting doctors prescribe it for illnesses not specified when off label use is normally up to the physician.
They leveraged pharmacies and pharmacists not to fill prescriptions - I read content where they overarching agency over pharmacy practice warned sternly that to fill such a prescription would mark the pharmacists as unprofessional and subject them to additional oversight over such concerning behavior.
The CDC could have granted time tested safe medications like HCQ and Ivermectin an Emergency Use Authorization so that people didn’t have to face covid without treatment.
What would the death toll for Covid be like if you were allowed treatment? How many other illnesses in the US would be declared a ‘pandemic’ if all treatment were denied to lay the groundwork for a fake vaccine a year or two down the road?
So there’s a D) the WHO/CDC ignored significant data, including large clincial trials, in order to drive up the death toll to meet the second criteria for granting faux ‘vaccines’ an EUA. There has to be an emergency - people dying in significant numbers. If they had allowed available, FDA approved drugs to be administered as soon as the person became ill, the death toll would align with seasonal flu fatalities - no lockdowns, no masks, no dangerous biowarfare agents to label “vaccines”
WHO is not as conscientious about the vaccine that gets injected into a body and cannot be removed, as they are about a pill you can swallow and passes out of your system in a couple days at most.
And that they didn’t is a HUGE red flag for me and tells me there’s more to this so called vaccine than meets the eye.
And so, I will NOT be taking it.
You hit the nail on the head; put the vaccine ahead of the preventatives so as to get more for research, distribution, and administering.
...follow the money.
[[“The latest guidance from WHO ignores several large clinical trials where ivermectin was proven to prevent mortality by more than 68%.”]]
~~~~~
Hmm, that % number sure has dropped since early reports on ivermectin. Last I knew it was approved 85% or so effective, with it reaching near 95%+ if taken every week
Tells you that the WHO is compromised, Bob.
Rumor has it that it can wipe our all their covid mutants! 👏👏🤣
Which is why they want to limit it’s use.
👍🏻👍🏻
it doesn’t look like it was the who that downgraded the % numbers i don’t think? looks like the clinical trial’s results?
of course those clinical trials likely didn’t use zinc along with it
All they have to do is run enough*studies* and eventually they’ll get the results they want and then tell us that studies prove........
How to lie with statistics.
Just saw a CREEPY ad, on MLB/Dodger game..
Cue the sentimental....I’ll Be Seeing You song...enter the grandkids running through Grandma’s door....hugs....
Announcer: It can soon be like this, for all, when you take your “vax”.
Just appalling.
Don’t forget...time is running short! Their “window” is closing.
flccc is the one making the claim that it’s 68% now- I’m guessing the studies didn’t include zinc as well?
My understanding is that zinc is critical.
It’s been known to be anti-viral for some time.
OK, I followed the comments upthread and got the gist of the conversation that I missed the first time around.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.