I've been thinking about the theory that there may be weapons of mass destruction and/or child trafficking victims on the Ever More. Below are some of my, 'what if' musings.
I've been thinking that the SUM OF ALL FEARS threat(s) Q mentioned may have included massive container ships 'armed' with nuclear devices and protected with human shields - thousand(s) of children.
The Deep State could threaten to detonate a nuke or nukes if approached or boarded by military. A ship (or ships) armed with nukes and 1000 little human shields could sail, and dock, around the world, making ghastly deliveries with impunity (who wants a nuke going off in a harbor, even without thousands of children onboard?). Perhaps it takes heroes figuring out which ship 'really' has the nuke payload, and which one's are decoys or armed with conventional explosives.
If conventional weapons were detonated prevent boarding by white hats, or to scuttle the ship at sea (by our subs), the rescue operation to save children that would ensue would not be promising.
Other threats (land-based nuke w/human shields) would likely have to have been disarmed before the white hats ran the Ever More aground in the canal.
With comms interrupted, the captain would be isolated from reaching his boss(es) to know how far to take resistance.
The Suez canal might be the best location (the most ideal I think) out of an extremely short list of potential boarding sites. The canal, the waterway which connects Asia to Europe; it's likely China's/Europe's main shipping pipeline for weapons and human trafficking etc.
At sea, their terrible crimes may go unobserved, but one could not so much as drop a soda bottle over the side in the Suez without provoking 'woke' outrage.
For days it sat there; the world knew what ship was involved, who owned it, who really owned it.
The countries bordering the region would 'object' to a nuke or conventional weapons going off, not to mention gun battles and the sight of human dead/dying children being carried off in broad daylight.
So the choice the DS must make is, "Do you want to go quietly, or shall we do this the hard way?" Once again I am astounded by warriors who face theses threats, witness the dead and they dying. May God bless them, grant them peace, and heal hearts wounded by the sight of atrocity.
I'd read somewhere that China is negotiating with countries, including Europe, to recreate its Silk Road with intention of economic dominion. The Suez was part of the maritime wing of the original road and carries 30% of cargo trade today.
So maybe the white hats utilized the least likely place the deep state would want to actually detonate a nuke payload. The Deep State relies on the canal for their trafficking and commerce.
Now other deep state ships have to be wary of the Suez; business must be 'off' on this key water way.
The white hat choice of the Suez would mean no need for conventional weapons, no risk of destabilizing a ship in deep water, rescue operations feasible if Captain or other use conventional weapons in the canal.
Today I see that Iran has a floating troop base in the Red Sea and I read that it's under attack, but no indication of who is attacking them (yet).
The Suez connects the Mediteranean Sea to the Red Sea. I'm wondering if the Iranian Troop base has been there long term to guard Deep State shipments, among other duties, or if they escort such ships.
Wikipedia:
The Suez Canal is a sea-level waterway in Egypt,
connecting the Mediterranean Sea to the Red Sea through the Isthmus of Suez. Constructed by the
Suez Canal Company between 1859 and 1869, it was officially opened on 17 November 1869.
Construction began: 25 September 1859; 161 years ago
Length: 193.3 km (120.1 miles)
Locks: None
But who else might have wanted to support or rescue the Ever More from white hats? I see in the latest Enoche HoneysuckleTN posted that the Theodore Roosevelt Strike Group is now operating in the South China Sea.
Prayers up for our warriors and all who move into harms way. May God grant them swift victory and complete protection from all weapons and designs fashioned against them.
This dovetails with what China is doing in Africa.
Why China Is Taking over Africa’s Resources One Country at a Time
The new imperialism.
https://nationalinterest.org/blog/buzz/why-china-taking-over-africas-resources-one-country-time-70526
Like US politicians the African politicians IMO are skimming money off the top so if the projects go bankrupt they still come out on top.
Excerpt:
China’s activities in the African continent have yet to receive the attention they deserve in the West. China’s behavior in Africa is important for three major reasons. First, China is the source of significant investment capital twinned with a prodigious ability to create infrastructure, both of which are needed by many African states. Second, China’s behavior in Africa provides the rest of the world with insight into how it will behave towards other states, particularly the states of the Global South, as it becomes equal in power with the United States. Third, what China is doing in Africa does not augur well for the rest of the world. China’s activities and behavior in Africa may only be described as neo-colonial and exploitative of African peoples and the environment.
China’s abusive behavior towards African states has occurred for decades. In 2007, Guy Scott, the former agricultural minister in the Zambian government told The Guardian, “We’ve had bad people before. The whites were bad, the Indians were worse, but the Chinese are worst of all.” But Sino-imperialism is getting worse as China grows in power and seeks evermore resources.
There are copious examples of the negative consequences of Sino-imperialism. One archetypical case is the China National Petroleum Corporation, the state-owned oil and gas company, which is a major investor operating in South Sudanese oil fields. The Chinese pollute the local environment with impunity, resulting in children born with deformities, the poisoning of livestock, destruction of fertile land, and the pollution of rivers. Additionally, the Chinese cause environmental destruction in the Northern Upper Nile and Ruweng states affects the indigenous Dinka Padang communities of South Sudan. The Chinese help produce oil generating revenue and economic opportunities but are not bound with environmental standards.
...the railway has been plagued with technical and financial challenges, which calls into question Ethiopia’s dependence on Chinese technology and debt-finance. The African country is struggling to repay its loan to China and reap the benefits of this dynamic infrastructure project. In 2018, Addis Ababa negotiated with China and structured its loan terms from fifteen to thirty years. In next door Kenya, as a result of heavy borrowing by the government, China may seize the port of Mombasa. According to Kenya’s Daily Nation newspaper, the terms are Draconian and state “neither the borrower [Kenya] nor any of its assets is entitled to any right of immunity on the grounds of sovereignty, with respect to its obligations.”
In addition to these abuses, the Chinese presence in Africa is defined by a purposeful isolation from the indigenous population. Chinese firms bring in their own drivers, construction workers, and support staff, denying these employment opportunities to Africans, and often live apart from the African societies in which they reside.
Today I see that Iran has a floating troop base in the Red Sea and I read that it's under attack, but no indication of who is attacking them (yet).
----------------------------------------------------
That's a very good theory that the Suez canal is a safe place for white hats to go on the offense. I was watching Amir Tsarfati's mid east update today and he showed an old photo of that Iranian ship and it had three Boston Whaler's secured to its deck. Amir was saying that everybody (Intel Agencies) are well familiar with that ship.
It was mentioned that a mine was somehow attached to the Iranian ship and did damage. The NY times blamed Israel but they have not taken credit for the attack.
