BREAKING: Dr. Fauci Admits COVID Vaccine May Not Be Safe

Washington Gazette ^ | 3-31-21 | Staff

[cornfedcowboy]

MOre people died from the vaccine than the actual virus.

---

Really? This should be in breaking news.

[bagster]

House Harkonnen says: What an incredibly STUPID, MISLEADING HEADLINE. And judging by the comments in this thread, the easily misled have been misled once again.

Fauci says: the epidemiologist blatantly stated that the country needed to "make sure" the vaccine truly is safe before we give it to children and maybe pregnant women

If they're not sure if its safe, then they don't know. If he makes this statement, there is evidence that its not safe, no matter how many times you say the word 'efficacy'.

You're losing control of your narrative, vaxxer.

#FauciIsAntiVax

[SecAmndmt]

No long term testing

No true placebo testing

[bitt]

p

[House Atreides]

Well, hello, Mister Misleader-in-Chief. Looks like you made bail again,

[wjcsux]

I have gotten into arguments here with people who are big time pro vaxxers. I have a lot of doctor and nurse friends (on the front lines) who all have refused to take it. They have only recommended it for patients who are at extremely high risk.

[ransomnote]

‘May not be safe’ and per other reports, the vaccine only reduces the symptoms because the recipient can still get COVID even after the vaccinations.

It seems that half of the info and prophylactics regarding COVID, its symptoms, its severity, its reliefs, etc., have been lies. The problem is in determining which half that is.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Risks have been suppressed, purged, deleted, and denounced as 'dangerous". Lies about the false benefits of the 'vaccines' have papered the world 24/7.

The NIH's website, Pub Med. archived peer reviewed research stating that trial subjects 'should' have been advised that the vaccines have a risk of sensitizing patients who may then develop ADE, and all patients of the vaccine should also receive that warning.

https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/33113270/

The research paper was submitted to Fauci's NIH in fall of 2020. It mirrors 16 year of prior research on failed mRNA vaccine trials for HIV, Hep C etc.

Yet, yesterday I took a screen shot of the  the following information from the CDC website in which they defer to the judgement of pregnant women whether to be vaccinated or not, without ever mentioning ADE therefore denying them access to informed consent. If anything, the CDC's information slyly raises fear of illness to drive the patient to accept the 'vaccine'.

Information about COVID-19 Vaccines for People who Are Pregnant or Breastfeeding | CDC

All those pushing this 'vaccine' on an uninformed public use the absence of sufficient data to prove it's a good product and to deny it's a bad product. 'Limited' current data on a technology with 16 years of failure (dead animal trials etc.) becomes the Good Housekeeping seal of approval, or the CDC/UK.GOV seal of approval.

The CDC's VAERS database lists the Covid vaccines at the top of the page (as of March 26, 2021) among 93 other FDA approved, established vaccines in the number of deaths observed following vaccination. This doesn't prove the vaccine caused all deaths - but all other vaccinations faced the same observation level and had fewer records of deaths, injuries. How can a 'vaccine' administered 3 months have more deaths than polio or other vaccines available for 10 or more years?

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Request (cdc.gov)

 

 

I think the public has cause to be concerned that the Pfizer and Moderna's vaccines are  #1 and #2 for deaths reported out of 225 total vaccines recorded in VAERS. Note the Covid vaccines have only been in use for three months, and #3 for reported deaths as been in use since 2004 (Oromune Polio Vaccine).

Despite all this, they have begun testing the Covid-19 vaccines on children:

Shots in little arms: COVID-19 vaccine testing turns to kids

3/28/2021, 5:44:31 AM · by ransomnote · 43 replies

kstp.com ^ | March 24, 2021 | kstp.com, ABC

[bagster]

Isn’t he an allergist by trade? If so, why is he the go-to guy for what amounts to an infectious disease?

For the same reason that our own gas_dr (an anesthesiologist) and all the fake, wanna-be scientists on FR are the go to guys for all things vax.

[bagster]

We’re over a 150 million doses now, I think.

Yea. Too bad anti-vax Fauci didn't speak up sooner.

Right?

[mrsmith]

“They have only recommended it for patients who are at extremely high risk.”

Very reasonable.

I get attacked by the most extreme (and silly) anti-vaxxers here but I’ve not taken the vaccine and don’t think those not at risk should.
I’m very glad my 90 year old Mother could and did.

Now how high a risk should persuade someone to take it?
I’d go for anyone at moderate risk since the results have been so good so far.
But that may change...

[bagster]

Well, hello, Mister Misleader-in-Chief. Looks like you made bail again.

I just thought it'd be fun to come watch you deny that Fauci said what he said.

And here you are.

Okay, do some more. Go.

[bagster]

I get attacked by the most extreme (and silly) anti-vaxxers here but I’ve not taken the vaccine and don’t think those not at risk should.

Ladies and gentlemen, you are witnessing the vaxxer shuffle.

See them dance, see them prance.

[wjcsux]

I believe that I had it in late January of last year. I felt like crap with all of the classic symptoms for a few days. I know several other people who had the same experience. I won’t take it.

[blueplum]

LOL - last week, the vaccine was the best decsion he had made in his life time

this week - maybe it’s Trump’s fault?

” children and maybe pregnant women, whom Fauci said are generally “vulnerable” to vaccines.”

now that’s the first true thing he’s said in months

[bagster]

So, do you think our future babies will be Eloi or Morlock? Or both?

#HGWellsHadItRight

[mrsmith]

Tell the truth I think I’ve had it and feel the same about a vax at this point.

But people at risk AND PEOPLE WHO HAVE PEOPLE AT RISK IN THEIR CONTACTS should take it IMO.
Though only they can/should decide.

[Jane Long]

Ha! they finally realized they were killing off the young.

The old farts can take the shots....useless eaters, and all.

(Is what I’m sure this FRAUDci subscribes to.)

[1_Rain_Drop]

Slight slide

"Pregnant people" ????

Isn't it usually women who are?

Or are they differentiating from pregnant animals?

[bagster]

I get attacked by the most extreme (and silly) anti-vaxxers

Really? What's extreme anti-vaxxer Fauci's screen name?

[Secret Agent Man]

Everyone taking this is “testing” it.

all guinea pigs.

they tell you its safe though

but you are their test subject

if something happens to you, you have no standing

and its an experimental vaccine, if you die your life insurance policy will notmpay out to your family