Replies

What tipped Dr. Frank off was the finding that there were more registered voters than actual residents by up to 150% in some counties.

One of the things I found interesting in the analysis by Dr. Frank was the entertaining of the question "Did you find any counties or locales that did NOT fit your hypothesis?"

That is a question less asked than it should be, and I sometimes fall prey to not looking at that more closely. We all do. We think of a reason why something is, develop a hypothesis, then find examples that buttress the hypothesis.

The last step, and one that is often ignored, is seeking out examples that DO NOT fit.

In his case, as an apparently conscientious scientist, he DID ask that question, and there was one county he found that did not fit exactly...Bent County in Colorado:

It was humorous, yet revealing: Notice the curve is volume of residents by census (on the Y axis) by age (on the X axis) and the blue curve absolutely does not match like it does everywhere else...but look at the age range there: 18 to 50 year olds, then it matches up again.

(FYI, The black line is registrations, the blue is predicted ballots (by the algorithm) and that red is actual ballots cast. The oddity is that the blue line is population by census...the 2020 census, and part of the descrepancies he is finding is because he thinks the algorithms were based on the 2010 census )

Odd, but...hmm. What would that population range out of whack between 18-50 signify? Not military, too weighted with older ages. It is prison population. In a county of 6500 people of whom 4700 are over the age of 17 , 1300 of them are prisoners in a correctional institution. That's about 28%!

LOL, they tried to plan for everything, but...weaving lies can be complicated when it goes a bit deeper...I just found that interesting.

That leaves me about speechless. Amazing!

The thing about lies this big and this complicated is that they always fall apart. The collapse has only just begun.

In the 2012 election cycle I did a phone bank where I called 5,000 voters. There were numerous people listed on my list of voters that did not live at the residence I called. I was amazed when one time I called for a voter, the people answered and I recognized her voice. We were friends and it became apparent to me that the Dems were sticking fake registered voters in residences they did not live.

My son had a job working for ACORN where he would call residences and confirm who lived at the residence. It was like a census operation. It confirmed what they were up to.

Odd, but...hmm. What would that population range out of whack between 18-50 signify? Not military, too weighted with older ages. It is prison population. In a county of 6500 people of whom 4700 are over the age of 17 , 1300 of them are prisoners in a correctional institution. That's about 28%!
LOL, they tried to plan for everything, but...weaving lies can be complicated when it goes a bit deeper...I just found that interesting.

My guess is that they didn't want to vote for inmates. The jail is a medium level facility, so probably not too many felons living there, but many people there for minor offenses or awaiting trial. They didn't want to vote for those people because they might get flagged as voting felons, or double voters. They only did that in places where they were desperate like AZ and GA.