Very strong credentials. I wonder what the libtards will have to say other than “well, we stole that election fair and square”.
Not seeing any data or mathematical analysis of Dr. Frank’s theorem, and not intending criticism, because people who haven’t done this sort of analysis may find this explanation a little daunting let me suggest that if you are interested, give it a try. Dr Frank is an excellent teacher who, as he explained, just happened to be teaching data analysis to very bright students using election data to illustrate curve fitting.
Some, as apparently does Steve Bannon, dismiss Lindell because he doesn’t sound like a Harvard grad. Lindell clearly grasped the issues and furthermore is one of very few putting his money out to prove his point. Bannon, I’m guessing, doesn’t know much about mathematics, or data, wants an important position for showing his leadership qualities, and, doesn’t believe he can ride Lindell, who is keeping Bannon’s Warroom program funded, and is not willing to put his reputation on a guy, no matter how well he has done creating a very profitable business, no matter that Lindell was a successful professional gambler and comfortable with big data.
Listen to Frank’s explanations, pausing whenever a graph is hard to read or when you don’t quite grasp the variables, the horizontal and vertical axis. Frank has proved his thesis. Data curves drawn from arbitrarily selected counties will never show exactly the same curve proportions. Frank has sampled all over the U.S. and the implication is that Lindell will support his continuing until all states are examined. There will be retired statisticians who will support, and many hired to try to find fault with Frank’s work. I graduated in mathematics, and even spent some time with polynomial functions. I find Frank’s mathematics very reasonable. The observation that every precinct in Ohio and those examined in Colorado all show the proportionality, including the curious double artifacts, is about as absolute as you get in data analysis. There had to be a reason, and that reason was that all the votes were created by an algorithm based upon the 2010 census. The November election was synthesized. No individual’s vote was decided by other than an algoritm. I bought some pillows, but may need some new slippers!
What are the bets that Lindell’s proposed media hub was named after Dr. Frank? If truth and science mean anything, the problem Lindell, and all of us need to solve is getting a hearing. When Lindell talks about getting this “Absolute Proof” to the supreme court, I cringe a little, because the Supreme Court is not Supreme any more. Navarro’s work is easier to understand, but departments of justice are compromised, both at the federal and state levels. The states have ignored him.
Lindell is certainly not slick; I would prefer that he control his desire to tell it all, forgetting that he is interviewing a scientist who has provided a key to proving his case, including the case with the election equipment crooks. The maligned Sidney Powell has made claims similar to what Frank proved, or will have proved about most the the states having been involved. If 2010 census data was the source of the curve applied in every state, there can be no doubt. Frank’s may have been connected to Powell.
Bttt
Must read later....
Reminder: Please post link on FB so I can get banned.
bkmrk
That's enough right there to have serious reforms.
Bump
bump
If a tree (a story) falls in the woods and nobody is near by (i.e., the main stream media don’t cover the story), does the falling tree make a noise?
Unfortunately it doesn’t. Today in this propaganda environment controlled by the mass biased media, truth does not matter. There use to be yellow journalism, today it is all blue, and the general public neither knows nor cares about what the media doesn’t cover.
What’s sad is Mike Lindell won’t shut up and allow anyone to speak. It is unlistenable. The content is very good and the experts are good but his interviews or whatever you want to call that is horrible.
Someone should tell Mike to not be so rude and allow his guests to get in a word. Don’t talk over them. It’s horrible.
I appreciate what he’s doing but he would be helping the cause more if he allowed a professional to do the interviews. He should at least try to be quiet for maybe 10 seconds.