Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: from occupied ga

So now you’ve moved from your apples-to-oranges onto the standard vaporware criticism of research without addressing the original fallacy. Trying to hide your tracks, to obfuscate, to change the subject.


73 posted on 04/01/2021 11:50:13 PM PDT by Kevmo (The tree of liberty is thirsty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies ]


To: Kevmo
Save your personal attacks for someone who gives a crap. The fallacy is that you're obviously a true believer as in the quote, "For the true believer no proof is needed nor disproof possible." Like I said snake oil with impressive sounding titles and no doubt scientific sounding gobbledegook in the description. I bet you believed in those 100 mpg carburators and the pill that you put in your gas tank that enables you to burn water.

All of which has nothing to do with batteries having a miniscule fraction of the energy density of fossil fuel.

The energy density of Lattice Enabled Nuclear Reactors and Enhanced Coulomb Repulsion devices is about 5,000X that of gasoline

Nice titles for a scam.

Oh and BTW since neither of these things actually exist, how do you know the energy density of them?

74 posted on 04/02/2021 11:02:29 AM PDT by from occupied ga (Your government is your most dangerous enemy - EVs a solution for which there is no problem)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson