But your argument reduces to the claim that an erroneous number is better than no number.
My argument reduces to the understanding that there are error margins, and that the bounds of those error margins exclude his conclusion. A bounded uncertainty is better than no number.
106 posted on 03/29/2021 12:22:22 AM PDT by lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)