I, being ignorant of the event and your trauma over all that, expected too much from you.
ThankQ for your compassion, but my comment about 'thread PTSD' was written in the same tongue-in-cheek manner as my comment about punishing people with a minimum of 5 owl slides. It was another of my 'swing-and-a-miss' attempts at humor. Instead, I'd say I had a 'bad day at work' and I learned a hard lesson.
I had no idea how administrative your role was, is, or has become.
I've never known what to call my service here. I guess I'd say at present it's that of emulsifier. From the web:
What is an emulsifier and why do I need It?
An emulsifier is used whenever you want to mix two components and hopefully keep them from separating. Emulsifiers are used where one ingredient is oil based (essential oils) and the other is water based.
I think that makes my role emulsive, rather than administrative. :)
I was hearing stompy foot, icky claims being repeated, mention of JR and FR, the thread under a pull threat, something about reputations and, for all practical purposes, to never post certain content. All that over Simon Parkes commentary that had nothing to do with any of it, or 8ch?
I admit, I couldn’t make head nor tails out of it, or how it remotely related to SP content, and when the Mods weren’t flagging it.
I feared I had already worn out the patience of the general Q thread population in my previous explanations re thread-pulling experience, and my prior impatient posts (I think 4K post threads are too much for me) of line by line details explaining why SP was a problem for Q threads.
My two long (boring?) posts specifically about considerations re SP on Q threads are here:
Part 1 - reasons for my request that SP not be posted on the Q thread (freerepublic.com)
Part 2 - reasons for my request that SP not be posted on the Q thread(freerepublic.com)
ThankQ for pointing out some are unaware of the 'why' behind my request that SP only be shared via FReepmail. I saw you up thread of my posts, engaging with same person on that topic I was, so I thought you were 'there'.
Here's your post on that thread.
RitaOk's prior post hours before mine on that thread re SP (freerepublic.com)
I sometimes think people were 'there' when they were away (my intel technology is limited, I don't yet 'have it all'). I don't think I noticed the first time I read your prior post, that you felt people were being threatened.
No one is arguing with what the man, SIMON PARKES, is saying about Q and current events, but threatening those who discuss it.
I encourage one and all to report any threats you receive on FR to Jim Rob ASAP.
I did read your post back then, but as I thinking now in hindsight, I think a 4K thread wears down patience, and I'll add 'reading comprehension'.
You make a good point that I can't assume people were there or recall information after so many thread 'miles' go by. I'll plan on putting something together to post at the start of the threads to clarify so it available without driving others crazy by repeating myself.
Thank you, RitaOk
Oh, wow. An exhaustive effort beyond your call to duty.
Yes, I do recall *American in Israel.
Neither *AnI, nor I, (at the time) could figure out why you wouldn’t separate the scandal of the man, from his intriguing British take exclusively regarding Q, particularly the Q global game plan, including the global financial chess, between the White Hats & the Black hats.
We, here, weren’t but barely discussing this development about money. Root of all evil? (Still a war, but apparently imminent correction coming, if the British-Q commentary is correct.)
Simon is impossible to defend. Trauma of some kind manifests in many ways. He appears to be very kind,, reserved. A sensitive and simple man, and says he is personally working toward healing abused children and adults who were trafficked and those who are rescuing them, all of which may relate, or not, to his own trauma, and the eerie story claims. Idk.
You’re right about SP’s unbelievability, based on whatever claims he’s made. Many, (most), might agree. He’s been banned, shunned and cursed absolutely Everywhere.
I’m not so discriminatory when it comes to hearing post-Q prognosticators. Also, I knew there were “no other comms outside of...”.
I concluded that was spot on, While.Q.Was.Communicating. It made perfect sense, then.
After that, “No”. Q knew some of us were going to buzz the field until we found someone talking Q drops, again.
Hope Floats, right.
So, now, I hear a half dozen. None have been more unique or out in front of SP. Very hard to say, for sure, who copies whom and then blows their own horn for simply repeating the remarks of someone else.
But all said, it is very generous of you to go so transparent of your journey, for our benefit.
Personally, I think this Thread rocks FR and that Everybody knows it. We’re blunt and sassy, but
considerate and civil with one another, cause no real trouble, in discourse or disagreements, and Most move on quickly. I like that about us.
In fact, we have put the Mods out of business on this thread. 🤪
Thanks, again, for the tome. And Blessed Holy Thursday! 😇