She could. But I don’t think that should be allowed. Talk about communism. Can’t even give life insurance to who you want. Obviously morals of these two aren’t great, but I still think being forced to hand over money is very communistic. I guess it’s cool around here.
When you are married, your assets are all “joint,” unless explicitly agreed to.
Please. A little too much sanctimony. Marriages are contracts and the states have their own laws that govern the contract. It’s as libertarian as it comes to say if you don’t want to be governed by laws of Utah, don’t move there. This isnt grab people’s money case, this is a marital relations case. I’m not a member of the UT bar, but my extremely quick review suggests wife might be out of luck
LOL, a well funded prostitute wants to keep collecting after her mark is dead. The Mark is too stupid for words. This particular prostitute has figured a way to get all the payment not sharing it with a pimp. And she want sto screw the wife now too when the mark dies off.
Horrible optics but if the husband is paying for the policy then he should be able to name the beneficiary. Only 100k? What a cheap B*****
She’s settling cheap. She should ask for half the guy’s social security benefits too.