I think communists have often used orchestrated social upheaval to cause people to look for something to give stability...and communism is offered as the only choice.
Agreed.
“Orchestrated” is exactly the right word.
In the article, the author talk about the election results in the context of an “urbanization index” to explain them, which legitimizes the result. He talks about the “urbanization index” that he says was predictive of the outcome, which I take issue with.
What explains that outcome is “fraud”, not any kind of predictive tool.
In my opinion, the Electoral College exists to exactly prevent the effects of an “urbanization index” or some concept like it, to prevent the tyranny of a few high population centers over large groups of people who are spread out.
And that is no accident. That was exactly what the framers were aiming for, and what a lot of people in those “spread out” areas rightly feared.
And it did a pretty good job until open and unashamed fraud became entirely acceptable as a tool, which is where we are now.
Unfortunately, The Constitution was created for a moral, generally law-abiding people. It did not take into account the rapaciously corrupt people who now rule this country, and are taking deliberate and planned steps to cement their tyranny.