Posted on 03/22/2021 8:56:54 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
People used to use multipart poisons so why not a multipart bio-weapon?
The control to limit final outbreaks to targeted areas would be to make the final stage so lethal that it worked very fast, burning its way through hosts before it could spread very far.
Communism is evil, period. It inspires wickedness of all sorts. Never underestimate how vile commies can be.
s’okay - Joe Biden has China covered ...
A Bio Weapon that over 99% of the people infected with survive?? Not a very good one if it is.
RE: A Bio Weapon that over 99% of the people infected with survive?? Not a very good one if it is.
It’s because it has not been perfected (yet) before the leak occurred.
I tend to agree, Shouldn’t the Press, Congress, The Mailman,... be asking Fauci and Gates how Stage 2 is coming along in Wuhan then???
“Not a very good one if it is.”
The Bio-Weapon was 100% successful for its intended purpose.
Well, if you want to kill alot of people your right. What if you just want to generate chaos, hurt the economy of your rivals, and change your enemies effective leader with a senile one who is controlled by Chinese money already?
Now, if you can just get the media on board to tell people it came from bat soup........
The world is China’s CCP petri dish, the occupants, their test subjects.
The world is China’s CCP petri dish, the occupants, their test subjects.
Print this up and get this out there in your precincts
There seems to be a refusal in certain political circles known as the Swamp to blame the CCP (Chinese Communist Party) for deliberately using the Wuhan virus to create an economy here which would prevent Trump get reelected. Letting that happen will create problems we don’t need. Time we point out the loss of employment and the corruption involved. and make China pay
Get News about corruption spiked by MSM Presented and sourced in Free Republic. com/ An all sides news collecting site by volunteers with no ads or fees which uses donations below just a sample Punch up link for http://www/freerepublic.com/
Besides corruption here is just some of the million$ that the Biden are involved in
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3820191/posts also Clinton
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-chat/3881585/posts
The CCP’s (China Communist Party) newspaper The Global Times has endorsed Biden Claiming he would be the easiest to work with.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3876187/posts
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3877139/posts#8
Biden campaign thanks the CCP (Chinese Communist Party for
using covid 19
Http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3940857/posts
CCP either intentionally released the virus, or took advantage of an accidental release. The rest of the world has to pretend this did not happen, as the only proportional response is nuclear war.
And the kicker is the U.S. helped pay for the development.
Ran across this Letter To The Editor in
ellsworthamerican.com/opinion
No idea true/false/in between...There’s a good deal of reading out there both ways about the little gnome that allege his and others involvement with Wuhan lab and ongoing “gain of function” research with the SARS/COVID virus...
Our tax dollars at work for us, I suppose?
Dr. Fauci: the untold story
June 4, 2020 on Letter to the editor, Opinion
Dear Editor:
As a retired newsman and incurable news “junkie” who has been around a few years and seen many big stories over the years, none that I can remember have evolved so rapidly or been so filled with misinformation and so confounding statistically as the COVID-19 global pandemic story.
As my neighbor, who is a sober, reflective guy, said, “I don’t know what to believe anymore. The longer the story goes on the more confusing and unclear it gets.”
Predictably and regrettably, the COVID-19 news reportage seems to be hoving to partisan lines more and more as well. Media literacy, which comes with using mixed sources to properly divine the truth, also requires us to be alert for stories that don’t make the mainstream press. Omissions can sometimes shed more light on a truth than a dozen in-depth stories on the same subject.
From what I can tell, a story that appeared more than a month ago in a London newspaper is the mother of all omissions when it comes to U.S. press coverage of the pandemic story. The London paper reported that the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, headed by virus expert Dr. Anthony Fauci, the President’s point man for the virus task force, gave a $3.7-million grant for the study of gain-of-function research at the now-infamous viral experimental lab in Wuhan, China! Indeed, reportedly Dr. Fauci, as head of the institute, approved the grant.
What is gain-of-function research? It is not as dull or benign as it sounds. Here is a definition found on Google: “Gain-of-function research (GOF) studies, or research that improves the ability of a pathogen to cause disease, help define the fundamental nature of human-pathogen interactions, thereby enabling assessment of the pandemic potential of emerging infectious agents, informing public health and preparedness efforts.”
That is a nice, nonjudgmental way of putting it. Put simply, as I understand it, GOF is a way for mankind to take an already nasty natural virus and make it much more potent or lethal in the lab. The supposed overarching goal is to use the mutated pathogen as a way to invent an effective vaccine. Some have called these “monster germs.”
What if the super-pathogen gets out of control, you might ask? Reasonable question. Some respected scientists raised the same question: The work (GOF) entailed risks that worried even seasoned researchers. More than 200 scientists called for the work to be halted. The problem, they said, is that it increased the likelihood that a pandemic would occur through a laboratory accident. Dr. Fauci defended the work. In 2014, the U.S. outlawed GOF research in this country specifically because of the biosafety risks to mankind! Dr. Fauci apparently did an end-run around his own government’s ban of GOF research and outsourced it to the Chinese at the Wuhan viral lab, and he did it with your tax money!
The newsman in me says there is a story here, a major pandemic story largely ignored in this country. I do know that, insofar as I can tell, throughout dozens of daily press conferences that I have seen, no Washington reporter has pursued this line of questioning with Dr. Fauci. Is it because he approved the grant to the Wuhan lab during the Obama administration? Or that Dr. Fauci is a revered scientist, a media hero in frightening times, whose image and savior narrative must be protected at all costs? Anthony Fauci is a mortal, flawed like the rest of us. In January, he assured us that the COVID-19 virus was not a serious threat to the United States. And a number of his predictions have been off the mark. Early on he said that masks were not helpful either. Now he is telling us to wear them.
We don’t know what really happened at the Wuhan lab because the Chinese won’t come clean. Is it possible that we, the world and our country are in the awful throes of a global pandemic triggered by a horrendous scientific GOF miscalculation? And that Dr. Anthony Fauci, highly respected viral expert, was somehow complicit, however unwittingly?
Sooner or later the story will be told in the United States. It is just too astonishing and far reaching to be suppressed or ignored.
V. Paul Reynolds
Ellsworth
True. Very true.
Simplest answer is most likely correct. The CCP built the Wuhan lab using Dr Fauci money from the US, stole the virus from Dr Fauci’s U.S. lab via Canada, and it was released accidentally into the blood-soaked market next door by selling dead lab animals and “meat”.
Clearly written, good summary. Thank you.
The virus was released intentionally. The only ones who benefited were the communists, and democrats. It was all part of their plan.
BKMRK.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.