Prove that the photo was manipulated.
Words are wind.

Oh, look. Q photo-shopped Trump into a pic of AF-1 from another administration. And magicked all the same stuff on the desk and bureau.
FYI, the Apple reflection is from the phone that Q posts on, in case you're wondering why Q even posted it in the first place.
The one with the reflection in the box was posted to show the position Q had to have been in to get that reflection. So all your stompy-feet 'proof' doesn't even address the point.
But you do you.
I recommend you figure out what was discussed by tens of thousands of 'Qtards' across the world regarding Q topics before you pop off with your dubious claims.
Honestly, bro. Its embarrassing and makes FR look like Hojo Hominigrits School for the Mentally Challenged. Its not a good look for you.

“And magicked all the same stuff on the desk and bureau.”
Except all the “same stuff” is not actually all the same stuff, and not in the same position. Plus the position of the blinds, chair, and lighting are not the same. So you’ve only served to prove my point that the original of the photo was the ABC news photo and Q’s is a very crudely manipulated copy.
Thanks for proving my point!
“Its embarrassing and makes FR look like...”
Really, you are not qualified to comment on what is “embarassing” or what is good for FR, as your words and actions over the past few years have amply demonstrated to everyone outside of the diehard true believers you have left. Nobody cares what you say, as it’s always the same junk over and over, and everyone can just look at the reality of the world today, compare it to your boy Q’s predictions, and see with absolute certainty that he was a fraud all along. Some of us were just a bit earlier getting to that realization than others, and maybe some day you’ll join us too, but I’m not holding out much hope for you anymore.
I downloaded the Q photo, rotated and flipped it, and lightened it to more or less match the ABC photo.
One thing stands out. There is something in the ashtray that is in front of the lamp which looks like it could be a cigar. That is clearly not present in the ABC photo. Why would a fraudster think to add in a cigar given it’s well known that Trump isn’t a smoker?
The relative positions of the lampshade with respect to the vertical lines of the curtain that are behind it are slightly different in the two photos. It’s close, but there are differences.
Another clear difference is the amount of the curtain you see to the left of the jacket on the chair. In the ABC photo, the last dark line that is fully visible is very close and almost touches the jacket and the pleats are evenly spaced. In the Q photo, that same dark line is farther away and the pleats in that area are pushed together, they aren’t exactly vertical.
They are definitely two different pictures.