Excerpt:
A front-page article appeared in the FranceSoir newspaper about findings on the Nakim website regarding what some experts are calling “the high mortality caused by the vaccine.”
The paper interviews Aix-Marseille University Faculty of Medicine Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Unit’s Dr. Hervé Seligmann and engineer Haim Yativ about their research and data analysis.
They claim that Pfizer’s shot causes “mortality hundreds of times greater in young people compared to mortality from coronavirus without the vaccine, and dozens of times more in the elderly, when the documented mortality from coronavirus is in the vicinity of the vaccine dose, thus adding greater mortality from heart attack, stroke, etc.”
Dr Hervé Seligmann works at the Emerging Infectious and Tropical Diseases Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France. He is of Israeli-Luxembourg nationality. He has a B. Sc. In Biology from the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and has written over 100 scientific publications.
FranceSoir writes that they follow publications, data analyzes, and feedback from various countries on vaccination, and have therefore taken an interest in the Nakim article, asking to interview them in order to understand their analysis and its limitations.
The authors of the article declare they have no conflicts or interests other than having children in Israel.
After a presentation, the authors discussed their data analysis, the validations carried out, limitations, and above all, their conclusions that they compare with data received via a Health Ministry Freedom of Information Act request.
Their findings are:
- There is a mismatch between the data published by the authorities and the reality on the ground.
- They have three sources of information, besides the emails and adverse event reports they receive through the Internet. These three sources are Israeli news site Ynet, the Israeli Health Ministry database, and the U.S. federal Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) database.
- In January 2021, there were 3,000 records of vaccine adverse events, including 2,900 for mRNA vaccines.
- Compared to other years, mortality is 40 times higher.
- On February 11, a Ynet article presented data related to vaccination. The authors of the Nakim article claim to have debunked this analysis based on data published by Ynet itself: “We took the data by looking at mortality during the vaccination period, which spans 5 weeks. By analyzing these data, we arrived at startling figures that attribute significant mortality to the vaccine.”
- The authors say “vaccinations have caused more deaths than the coronavirus would have caused during the same period.”
- Haim Yativ and Dr. Seligmann declare that for them, “this is a new Holocaust,” in face of Israeli authority pressure to vaccinate citizens.
Yeah so vaccines carry risk. Look it up. The Small pox vaccine killed tens of thousands world wide what’s your point. Total deaths matter. Right now the CFR in the USA from John’s Hopkins University the world authority on endemic diseases is 1.8% for all ages and over 3% for the most at risk groups of age and comorbidity factors. Even granting every death in VAERS was caused by the vaccines the probability of death from one of the 3 approved versions is 0.0018% it’s a raw numbers game. I took the Pfizer version last week I’m a scientist a real one with a stack of degrees. I have access to EBSCO and scidirect and can read every scientific paper published world wide for free well so sponsored by my benefactors anyways I have access to real peer reviewed science data. Having read the Pfizer phase 1,2&3 study reports and papers I decided that a less than .002% chance of death was better than a 30+% change of hospitalization and a 3% chance of death from the virus that eventually I would be exposed too. Every single human on earth will be exposed at some point it’s endemic now. The overall hospitalization rate for 50+ with 2 or more comorbidities is above 30% no thanks I don’t want the $100 grand bill either. So looking at the science I said Pfizer was the smarter choice of the JnJ one was widely available I would have chosen that one due to its single dosing.