I make no such admission. Perhaps you meant "accusation".
I have followed Kevmo's link and found the following:
21. Battaglia, A., et al., Neutron emission in Ni-H systems. Nuovo Cimento Soc. Ital. Fis. A, 1999. 112 A: p. 921.
The summary for this paper mentions Ni-H and not palladium. That answers one of my simple questions: "Did all the experiments use deuterium loaded palladium". The answer is "NO".
Coincidentally, this paper includes Focardi as a contributor. I seem to recall an association between Focardi and Andrea Rossi.
Sorry. Thought this was aimed at me since you scolded me about FR rules.
You make no such admission but humblegunner does. Your search for allies in your attempt to hijack this thread is blatant and ugly.
If you are so concerned about bad information getting out with regards to fusion energy policy, then post your own counter thread. I’m sure the admin moderator won’t mind if you post a linkee to your own thread within our cold fusion thread on the same subject.
What we need is an intermediate thread where we can have all the argumentation and back&forth that you enjoy so much, but I get a chance to show how you’re simply applying your own humpty dumpty/ move-the-goalpost standard to scientific process just because you want hot physics dudes to keep their paycheck.
It is a simply loaded question you asked.
I notice you did not start your own thread to produce such counter-information.
That would be the proper way to follow the current rules. Only 152 more replications more for you to knock down according to your humpty dumpty definition of replication which ONLY applies to LENR. Hmmmmmm....