The abstract was viewed over 102,000 times by people hungry for answers. Six weeks later, the journal suddenly rejected the paper, based on an unnamed “external expert” who stated that “our conclusions were unsupported,” contradicting the four senior, expert peer reviewers who had earlier accepted them. I can’t help but interpret this in context as censorship.
Ping for your interest
Vaccines can only be approved under “Emergency Use Authorization” if there is no current effective treatment.
IMO this is an important story, well written, well explained and well reasoned. Thanks for posting it.
Bookmark
The cure for Covid 19 must be a new high tech vaccine made by the governtment-pharmaceutical industrial complex. Or else.
Pandemic? What pandemic?
Want to know how to end this nonsense? Refuse to participate.
FDA won’t approve harmless drugs for unlabeled purposes used in patients already ill unless they go through ‘phase three’ trials. Yet will approve the use of an experimental vaccine for healthy people with - what -3 or 4 months of trials. Clownworld
Just insane and evil.