You’re belief that “they reviewed them and effectively eliminated the vaccine as the cause” is incorrect. I repeat again what the chief Medical Examiner said.
Dr. Erik Christensen, Utah’s chief Medical Examiner, said proving vaccine injury as a cause of death almost never happens. “Did the vaccine cause this? I think that would be very hard to demonstrate in autopsy,” he said.
Erik can think of only one instance where you would see a vaccine as the cause of death on an official autopsy report and that would be in an immediate case of Anaphylaxis. One where a person received the vaccine and died almost instantaneously. “Short of that” he said, “it would be difficult for us to definitively say this is the vaccine.” A more likely result, would be a lack of answers or an “incomplete autopsy.”
The autopsy, he said, can provide answers to a family when no disease or red flags are found. As Erik explained, “that we don’t see a competing cause of death.” That lack of answers may help them understand if the vaccine was a possible cause.
He says that it would be very hard to determine in an autopsy that a vaccine contributed to the death.
It isn't my belief, it's what the CDC says and I provided you the link to where they say it. They and the FDA may be lying but that's a different issue.
Utah’s chief Medical Examiner, said proving vaccine injury as a cause of death almost never happens...
Fair enough, but if the autopsy provided proof there would be no need for the CDC and FDA to review the deaths. In fact, the uncertainties the ME describes are exactly why they do the review - to look for evidence, not proof, that the vaccine contributed to the death. To date they haven't found that evidence.
The CDC has clearly stated that they do these reviews and there's no conflict with what the Utah ME says.
What exactly is your point? That we'll never see a case where a vaccine contributed to a death so we just have to assume it did based on a totally invalid statistical analysis?