Again, a naturalization law that says who doesn't need to be naturalized?
It supports what I've been saying all along. The Constitution identifies two forms of citizenship - natural-born and naturalized. If you are not one then you're the other.
Astonishing. Absolutely astonishing.
I've seen this once before. At a hypnotism show decades ago, the hypnotist hypnotized a man into forgetting the number "7", and then had him count to ten. Everyone laughed when he went "5,6,8,9,10."
You read that paragraph and somehow couldn't see the one thing that absolutely and blatantly contradicted your position. You went straight to the "two forms of citizenship" thing, and completely missed "can only be a naturalized citizen."
Bravo. Well done.
If you want to call it that. To me it's a law which is part of 8 U.S. Code I that identifies those who do not need to be naturalized. 8 U.S. Code II identifies how those acquire their citizenship through naturalization do so. Anyone not identified in 8 U.S. Code I has to resort to the laws in 8 U.S. Code II. Archie is covered in Code I.
Astonishing. Absolutely astonishing.
Lightbulb go on again?