[DoodleDawg]

Prior to 1922, she couldn't pass on citizenship. Would he have been a citizen prior to 1922? The law of that time says "no", but i'm interested in hearing what you think would have happened.

Under the laws of the time, no. Under current law he's a natural born citizen.

I find strong cognitive dissonance to be fascinating.

Sorry to disappoint. But I admit I find birther threads amusing.

[DiogenesLamp]

Under the laws of the time, no. Under current law he's a natural born citizen.

What other constitutional terms can be redefined by congress passing laws? This method is sooo much easier than passing amendments.

Sorry to disappoint.

You aren't disappointing. I almost fell out of my chair when you said "naturalization laws" that "identify" people who don't need naturalization.

Funniest thing i've seen all day.