Naturalization laws do. Part of those laws requires identifying who doesn't need to be naturalized, AKA natural-born citizens, and Archie is covered by that because of his mother.
I think he is only a citizen from the naturalization act of 1952. (or subsequent iteration thereof)
Later than that. The current law is 8 U.S. Code § 1401 which identifies people who don't need to be naturalized to be citizens, AKA natural-born citizens.
This leaves him in the position of having to "elect" to remain an American citizen, or choose to be a British subject.
Why? Nothing prevents him from having dual citizenship.
And I will reiterate. If you have to "elect" to be a citizen, you are not a natural born citizen. You are a creature of written law, not natural law.
And so far as I know, though admittedly I don't keep up with the doings of the Royals, Archie hasn't had to elect anything.
He likely doesn’t want US citizenship if he has a visa that allows him to dodge US income taxes.
Yes. They do. Yes, naturalization laws do indeed apply here. :)
Later than that. The current law is 8 U.S. Code § 1401 which identifies people who don't need to be naturalized to be citizens, AKA natural-born citizens.
A naturalization law that "identifies" people who don't need naturalization.
:)
Archie hasn't had to elect anything.
He's too young. American law doesn't require a child to choose his citizenship till he reaches the age of maturity.