And that is in the Constitution where exactly?
Rogers v. Bellei illustrates this.
Of course it did. Well, the kids living here so Rogers v. Bellei would be moot even if later law didn't supersede it.
That said, I would guess that nearly all of the public is of a mind that naturalization only occurs if and when there is a ceremony.
Propably. So if there isn't a ceremony then are they natural born?
Naturalization only works on, and is only necessary for people who are not or would not be citizens otherwise.
True. I don't see where Harry's kid needed a ceremony.
That's what most people believe, and they are closed minded so discussion on the point is waste.