Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 03/8/21 Vol.341, Q Day 1228
qalerts.app ^ | 3/8/2021 | FReeQs, FReepers and Vanity

Posted on 03/08/2021 3:27:46 PM PST by ransomnote

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,861-1,8801,881-1,9001,901-1,9201,921-1,930 last
To: Ymani Cricket; ransomnote
Goes with 1920

@NobodyzFoolz
9h
@PoliticalMadness

"Yes Satanist Do LOVE Their Symbols!!!"


1,921 posted on 03/16/2021 10:05:23 PM PDT by Ymani Cricket ( "Pressure Makes Diamonds" ~General Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1920 | View Replies]

To: Pete from Shawnee Mission

.


1,922 posted on 03/17/2021 6:29:50 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP! WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1728 | View Replies]

To: Cats Pajamas

.


1,923 posted on 03/17/2021 7:13:12 AM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP! WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1754 | View Replies]

To: meyer

.


1,924 posted on 03/17/2021 12:38:38 PM PDT by pgkdan (The Silent Majority STILL Stands With TRUMP! WWG1WGA)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1801 | View Replies]

 
YOUTUBE deleted this video before. It's posted again and I've placed the auto-generated transcript below it in case it's deleted again.
 
 
Here's the FR thread:
 
 
00:00
good afternoon i'm dr peter mccullough
00:02
and i'm an internist and cardiologist
00:04
and professor of medicine at texas a m
00:06
university school of medicine i'm on the
00:08
baylor dallas campus
00:11
and i've been integrally involved in the
00:14
response to covet 19.
00:16
now the opinions i'll express are those
00:19
of my own
00:20
and not necessarily those of my
00:21
institution
00:23
i can tell you that in my field i'm an
00:26
academic doctor i see patients but i'm
00:28
very involved in research
00:30
i'm an editor of two major journals in
00:32
my field
00:34
i'm the most published person in my
00:36
field which deals with the heart and the
00:37
kidneys
00:38
in the world in history and when covet
00:41
19
00:42
hit i saw it as our medical super bowl
00:45
and there were going to be doctors like
00:46
dr urso coming out of
00:49
wherever they worked to face the virus
00:52
and there were doctors in the hospital
00:54
that just had to receive
00:55
the virus and then there were those who
00:58
headed for the sidelines
01:00
and then there were those that were
01:02
detractors against the pandemic
01:05
and so as i started to survey the
01:07
literature
01:08
i had patients with heart and lung
01:10
disease who needed urgent treatment
01:13
and i refused to let an illness which
01:15
lasted for two weeks at home
01:18
before they got sick enough to be
01:19
hospitalized i refused to let a patient
01:22
languish at home
01:23
with no treatment and then be
01:25
hospitalized when it was too late it was
01:27
obvious that was obvious in
01:28
april that that was the case so i used
01:31
the best
01:32
tools or drugs available at the time and
01:35
these are
01:35
appropriately prescribed
01:38
off label remember a label is an
01:40
advertising label a label isn't a
01:42
scientific document
01:43
sure it's there there is an
01:44
appropriately prescribed
01:46
off-label use of conventional medicine
01:49
to treat
01:50
an illness and i uh in may i put
01:54
together a team of doctors
01:55
because the the the group that was
01:57
facing the pandemic to the greatest
01:59
degree was in milan italy so most of
02:00
them were in the coracle
02:02
italian research network we summarized
02:04
all we knew about the available drugs
02:07
and we published our findings in the
02:08
august
02:10
8th issue of the american journal
02:12
medicine and the title of that paper was
02:14
the pathophysiologic basis and rationale
02:17
for early ambulatory treatment and it
02:19
had a premise
02:20
there's two bad outcomes to covet 19
02:22
hospitalization and death
02:24
the second premise if we don't do
02:26
something before the hospitalization
02:28
we can never stop it we can never stop
02:30
it and i have to tell you when
02:32
i was a lead author in that paper but we
02:34
had dozens of authors from italy
02:36
india ucla emory we had the best
02:39
institutions in the united states
02:40
i can tell you the interesting thing was
02:42
there was 50 000 papers in the
02:44
peer-reviewed literature on covid
02:46
not a single one told the doctor how to
02:48
treat it
02:49
not a single one when does that happen i
02:52
was absolutely stunned and when this
02:54
paper was published in american journal
02:55
medicine it became a lightning rod oh my
02:57
gosh it became the most cited paper
02:59
in basically all of medicine at that
03:00
time the world started and boy the world
03:03
started knocking down my door and i said
03:04
oh my lord i just can't believe what
03:06
became untapped and um i
03:09
had never been on social media before
03:12
and
03:13
my daughter who was home from law school
03:15
was talking to her about it she said
03:16
well why don't i make a youtube video
03:18
so i made a youtube video with four
03:20
slides from the paper
03:22
this is a peer-reviewed paper published
03:23
in one of the best medical journals
03:25
in the world four slides i even wore a
03:27
tie in a suit and she showed me how to
03:29
record it in powerpoint and i posted on
03:31
youtube
03:32
it went absolutely viral and within
03:34
about a week
03:35
youtube said you violated the terms of
03:38
the of the um
03:39
community and that's when senator
03:41
johnson's office got involved in
03:43
washington said oh my gosh this is
03:44
important scientific
03:45
information to help patients in the
03:48
middle of this crisis
03:49
and social media is striking it down
03:51
based on what authority
03:53
well one thing led to another uh and i
03:55
became the lead witness for the u.s
03:57
senate testimony of
03:58
november 19 2020 and the reason why
04:00
there was senate testimony
04:02
is because there was a near total block
04:05
on any information of treatment to
04:07
patients
04:08
a near total block and so what had
04:11
happened over time
04:12
is that we had gotten into a cycle in
04:14
america
04:15
uh of no information on treatment
04:18
patients actually think
04:19
that the virus is untreatable and so
04:21
what happens is they go out to get a
04:23
diagnosis
04:24
now i'm a coveted survivor my wife in
04:26
the galley is a
04:27
father in a nursing home is a cobit
04:28
survivor
04:30
you get handed a diagnostic test it says
04:34
here you're covet positive go home
04:37
is there any treatment no is there any
04:39
resources i can call
04:41
no any referral lines hotlines no any
04:43
research hotlines
04:44
no that's the standard of care in the
04:47
united states
04:48
and if we go to any one of our testing
04:50
centers today in the in texas
04:51
i bet that's the standard of care i bet
04:54
that's the standard of care
04:55
no wonder we have had 45 000
04:58
deaths in texas the average person in
05:00
texas thinks there's no treatment
05:03
they honestly think there's no treatment
05:05
they don't even know about these eua
05:07
antibodies you heard from
05:08
a 90 year old gentleman who got bam
05:10
terrific
05:12
where's the focus there's such a focus
05:14
on the vaccine where's the focus on
05:16
people sick right now
05:17
this committee ought to know where all
05:19
these monoclonal antibodies are they
05:21
ought to know where all the treatment
05:22
protocols are
05:23
they ought to have a list of the
05:24
treatment centers in texas that actually
05:27
treat patients with covet 19. so i led
05:30
the initiative
05:31
the second paper was published in a
05:32
dedicated issue of reviews in
05:34
cardiovascular medicine now i had
05:36
57 authors including dr urso dr
05:39
emanuel uh lead doctors in houston san
05:42
antonio all over and it was
05:43
another worldwide paper and now we have
05:45
it updated integrated
05:47
so yes we used drugs to affect viable
05:49
replication the antibodies are terrific
05:51
we can use intracellular anti-infectives
05:54
in that box
05:55
we use corticosteroids and inflammatory
05:57
drugs the best anti-inflammatory drug is
05:59
colchicine
06:00
you've probably never heard about it in
06:01
the largest highest quality randomized
06:04
trial
06:04
over 4 000 patients double blind
06:07
randomized placebo-controlled trial
06:09
there's a 50
06:10
reduction in mortality no word of it
06:13
none complete block to anybody
06:16
culture scene how can that be how can
06:19
that be and then the most deadly part of
06:21
the the viral
06:22
infection is thrombosis so i have always
06:25
treated my patients
06:26
with something to treat the virus
06:28
something to treat inflammation and
06:30
something to treat pharmacists just as
06:31
dr urso had
06:33
and i have very very sick patients and
06:35
i've lost two
06:38
but i have to tell you what has gone on
06:40
has been beyond
06:41
belief how many of you have turned on a
06:44
local news station
06:45
or a national cable news station and
06:48
ever gotten an
06:49
update on treatment at home
06:52
how many of you have ever gotten a
06:54
single word about what to do when you
06:56
get
06:57
the hand of the diagnosis of 19. no
07:00
wonder
07:01
that is a complete and total failure at
07:04
every level
07:05
okay let's take the white house how come
07:07
we didn't have a panel of doctors
07:09
assigned to put all their efforts and
07:12
stop these hospitalizations
07:13
why don't we have doctors who actually
07:15
treated patients get together
07:17
in a group and every week give us an
07:19
update
07:20
why didn't we have that why didn't we
07:22
have that at the state level zero
07:24
why don't we have any reports about how
07:26
many patients were treated
07:27
in spared hospitalizations from all that
07:29
i listen to six hours of testimony today
07:31
zero zero we have a complete and total
07:36
blank spot
07:37
on treatment it is a blanking phenomenon
07:41
at least in the united states there's
07:42
some heroes now the american society of
07:44
physician and surgeons
07:45
took the lead they're the group they've
07:47
identified 35 treatment centers in texas
07:49
they know who they are
07:50
they have emergency hotlines they helped
07:53
dr hall put together
07:54
this very brief pamphlet but there's
07:56
more an extensive one we can pass it
07:58
around to everyone
07:59
that at least gives people half a chance
08:01
to find out
08:02
about information okay this is a
08:06
complete and total travesty to have a
08:08
fatal disease
08:09
and not treat it now the national
08:11
institutes of health and the infectious
08:13
disease design of
08:14
america started putting out guidelines
08:16
in the treatment of covet 19
08:17
and to this date they nearly exclusively
08:20
deal with a hospitalized patient
08:22
the two papers that i have published as
08:24
the lead author
08:25
and supported by wonderful people by dr
08:27
urso are the
08:28
only publications in the peer-reviewed
08:31
literature
08:32
that tell doctors how to treat covet 19
08:34
as an outpatient
08:36
based on the support of scientific
08:37
information the only two
08:39
the home treatment guide by the american
08:41
physicians and surgeons
08:42
is the only source of information
08:45
available to patients
08:46
on how to treat cova 19 at home the only
08:49
source
08:50
so what can be done right here right now
08:51
there's going to be more people that die
08:53
in texas and it's an absolute tragedy
08:54
how about tomorrow let's have a law that
08:57
says there's not a single result given
08:59
out
08:59
without a treatment guide and without a
09:02
hotline of how to get into research
09:04
let's put a staffer on this and find out
09:06
all the research available in texas and
09:07
let's not have a single person go home
09:10
with with a test result with their fatal
09:12
diagnosis
09:13
sitting at home going into two weeks of
09:15
despair before they succumb to
09:17
hospitalization and death
09:19
it is unimaginable in america that we
09:22
can have such a complete and total blind
09:23
spot
09:24
i blame the doctors for not stepping up
09:26
where was the medical society
09:28
stopping up and putting effort on this
09:30
how about from the federal and state
09:31
agencies there never was
09:33
a single bit of group collaborative
09:36
effort to stop the hospitalizations
09:39
nobody even kind of thought about it bob
09:41
hall had me hana
09:42
teleconference in in april or may and
09:44
we're like wait a minute
09:45
how come where's ut southwestern i'm a
09:47
graduate of ut southwestern
09:49
where's a m where's the rest of the
09:51
universities how come we're not stopping
09:52
this
09:53
how come we are not stopping this but it
09:55
gets worse because
09:57
in the paper i published in december of
09:59
of 2020 you know what he did i had i had
10:01
a terrific
10:02
doctor from brazil we went through
10:04
country by country by country and just
10:06
asked the question what
10:07
are the countries doing was the last
10:09
time you turned on the news and ever got
10:11
a window to the outside world
10:13
when did you ever get an update about
10:15
how the rest of the world is handling
10:17
covet
10:19
never what's happened in this pandemic
10:21
is the world has closed in on us there's
10:23
only one doctor
10:25
whose face is on tv now one not a panel
10:28
doctors we always work in groups we
10:29
always have different opinions there's
10:32
not a single media doctor
10:34
on tv who's ever treated a covid patient
10:37
not a single one there's not a single
10:40
person in the white house task force has
10:41
ever treated a patient
10:43
why don't we do something both why don't
10:44
we put together a panel of doctors that
10:46
have actually treated outpatients of
10:48
covet 19
10:49
and get them together for our meeting
10:51
and why don't we exchange ideas
10:53
and why don't we say how we can finish
10:55
the pandemic strongly
10:56
isn't it amazing think about this think
10:59
about the complete and total blind spot
11:01
so what happened i can tell you what
11:02
happened what happened in around may
11:04
it became known that the virus was going
11:06
to be amenable to a vaccine
11:09
all efforts on treatment were dropped
11:11
the national institutes of health
11:12
actually had a multi-drug program
11:14
they dropped it after 20 patients said
11:15
we can't find the patients
11:17
the most disingenuous announcement of
11:18
all time and then warp speed went
11:21
full tilt for vaccine development and
11:24
there was a silencing of any information
11:27
on
11:27
treatment any silencing
11:31
scrubbed from twitter youtube can't get
11:34
papers published on this
11:35
you can't we can't even get information
11:37
out in our own medical literature on
11:39
this
11:39
there's been a complete scrubbing so
11:41
this program has been one of
11:43
try to reduce the spread of the virus
11:45
and wait for a vaccine
11:47
and when we've when we vaccinate all
11:49
efforts have to be on vaccination and
11:51
probably if i had four hours of
11:52
vaccination on here think about it as we
11:54
sit here today
11:56
the calculations in texas on herd
11:58
immunity
11:59
the calculations are we're at eighty
12:01
percent herd immunity right now
12:03
with no vaccine effect eighty percent
12:05
and more people are developing cova
12:07
today
12:07
they're gonna become immune people who
12:09
develop covid have
12:10
complete and durable immunity and a very
12:14
important principle
12:15
complete and durable you can't beat
12:17
natural immunity you can't vaccinate on
12:19
top of it and make it better
12:21
there's no scientific clinical
12:24
or safety rationale for ever vaccinating
12:28
a cove
12:29
recovered patient there's no rationale
12:31
for ever testing a covert recovery
12:33
patient my wife and i are covered
12:34
recovered
12:34
why do we go through the testing outside
12:36
there's absolutely no rationale
12:38
i'd encourage this committee to actually
12:40
look at what's being done
12:42
and ask is there any rationale is there
12:44
any rationale for anything
12:46
listen there's plenty of cover to
12:48
recover patients let them forego the
12:50
vaccine
12:51
and let people who are clamoring for it
12:53
get it but at 80 percent
12:55
hurt immunity in the vaccine trials
12:57
fewer than one percent
12:59
in the vaccine in the placebo actually
13:01
get coveted fewer than one percent
13:03
the vaccine is going to have a one
13:04
percent public health impact that's what
13:06
the data says
13:08
it's not going to save us we're already
13:09
80 hurt immune
13:11
if we're strategically targeted we can
13:14
actually close out the pandemic
13:15
very well with the vaccine but
13:17
strategically targeted people under 50
13:19
who fundamentally have no
13:21
health risks there's no scientific
13:24
rationale for them to ever become
13:26
vaccinated
13:28
there's no scientific rationale one of
13:30
the mistakes i heard today as a
13:32
rationale for vaccination as
13:33
asymptomatic spread and i want you to be
13:34
very clear about this my opinion is
13:38
there is a low degree if any of
13:41
asymptomatic spread
13:42
sick person gives it to sick person the
13:45
chinese have published a study british
13:46
medical journal
13:47
11 million people that try to find
13:49
asymptomatic spread you can't find it
13:51
and that's been you know one of
13:53
important pieces of
13:55
misinformation when senator hall called
13:58
a conference call
13:58
what should we do in the capitol when we
14:00
reopened i said you know what you know
14:03
what we do at baylor
14:04
you walk in and they zap your
14:05
temperature you got a temperature check
14:06
and go in
14:08
i mean do we test everybody who walks in
14:10
the baylor hospital no are they a lot
14:12
sicker than everybody in this room you
14:13
better believe it
14:14
so why would we do something here at the
14:15
capitol
14:17
that has absolutely positively no
14:19
scientific rationale
14:20
and then do it in this context so my
14:23
testimony as i said here today
14:25
is covet 19 has always been a treatable
14:27
illness
14:28
a very large study from mckinney texas
14:30
another one from new york city
14:32
show that when doctors treat patients
14:35
early
14:35
who are over age 50 with medical
14:37
problems with a sequence multi-drug
14:39
approach with the available drugs uh
14:41
four to six drugs that are available
14:44
to them now the monoclonal antibiotics
14:46
are better better there's an
14:47
85 reduction in hospitalizations and
14:50
death
14:51
85 85 percent i want you to remember
14:56
that number 85 percent
14:58
we have over 500 000 deaths in the
15:00
united states
15:03
the preventable fraction could have been
15:05
as high as 85 percent
15:07
if our pandemic response would have been
15:10
laser focused
15:11
on the problem the sick patient right in
15:13
front of us we're focused over here and
15:14
focused over there and focused on masks
15:16
and
15:16
what have you laser focused sick patient
15:19
treat them
15:20
we lost focus on the most fundamental
15:22
doctor that's my that's my testimony
15:24
yeah thank you i can tell how passionate
15:27
you are and certainly i have been a
15:29
leader
15:29
in talking about preventive protocols
15:32
and also the ambulatory stage and i do
15:35
think that that has been missing
15:37
and it's been a concern because kova 19
15:39
is going to be with us right i mean it's
15:41
uh
15:42
you know i hope we're at 80 percent
15:44
heard immunity i don't know yet i'll
15:46
read your papers but
15:47
um i appreciate that and the message is
15:50
is that there are drugs out there that
15:51
work
15:52
there are therapies out there that work
15:54
but no single one works alone
15:56
and so the the the dismissive mistake
15:58
was to do a very small study oh we
16:00
studied 200 patients
16:01
and we used ivory hydroxychloroquine and
16:04
it didn't work that's like
16:05
cancer and picking one drug and saying
16:07
oh it doesn't reduce cancer mortality we
16:09
never do that in cancer we never did
16:10
that in aids we don't do in hepatitis c
16:13
what we look is for is signals of
16:14
benefit and acceptable safety and then
16:17
we combine them
16:18
and that's what that's all we've done so
16:20
but but but this
16:21
independent declaration drug by drug
16:23
that drugs don't work
16:25
has been uh and that's on that's on us
16:27
that's been our medical house
16:28
that's been a a giant um error
16:31
that we've made on our side we never
16:33
should have expected single drugs to
16:35
reduce mortality
16:36
but drugs in combination against a fatal
16:38
vital infection
16:39
we should have this entire session is
16:40
less learned from lessons i know we're
16:42
running short on time
16:44
uh center hall you have one question or
16:49
real quick um i'd ask the question
16:51
earlier when dr hellestad was here
16:54
about the idea that fits in with what
16:55
you've talked about
16:57
is that when we test someone rather than
17:00
just say
17:00
give them yep you're positive you're
17:02
negative be on your way
17:04
that we at least provide them
17:06
information
17:07
of what we know out there can be
17:10
can be used not trying to play the role
17:13
of doctor
17:14
out there would you do you agree with
17:18
dr hellestadt's interpretation that that
17:21
should not be done
17:22
because it's setting up a doctor-patient
17:24
relationship
17:25
and simply informing people or providing
17:28
with with
17:29
over-the-counter drugs that
17:32
so that we could possibly have the early
17:36
treatment
17:36
for these folks rather than wait till
17:39
they show up in the hospital
17:40
we could at least have a physician group
17:44
approved a guide the aaps guide has been
17:47
used in over 500
17:48
000 cases in the united states in fact
17:50
the early treatment is probably
17:52
what prevented us from overflowing the
17:54
hospitals in the
17:55
in the last quarter of the year i when i
17:57
testified i said listen we're on track
17:59
and i was very
17:59
convinced of this we're on track of
18:01
overflowing our hospitals our break
18:02
point was 135 000 in the hospitals
18:04
united states we hit 128.
18:06
now the curve started going down long
18:08
before the vaccine so i can tell you
18:10
herd immunity
18:11
long before the vaccine showed up
18:12
started to go down but the early
18:14
treatment kicked up ivermectinus
18:16
skyrocketed hydroxychloroquine
18:18
monoclonal antibodies as much as we can
18:20
push them sadly the monoclonal
18:21
antibodies are still sitting on the
18:22
shelf
18:23
in a lot of places but committees like
18:25
this ought to be saying listen where are
18:26
those monoclonal antibiotics
18:28
are do we stock them at the nursing home
18:29
what are the big nursing home chains
18:31
what are the big urging care chains in
18:33
texas and what are they doing what are
18:34
their early treatment protocols
18:36
you know these are blank spots i bet
18:38
nobody here has even thought about this
18:40
this is this is really low hanging fruit
18:43
that we can
18:44
uh we can tackle the bottom line is
18:47
a lot of doctors have checked out and
18:48
when patients call them they say i don't
18:50
treat covet
18:52
and when i asked those doctors i said
18:53
you don't treat how come they go well
18:54
there's no treatment
18:56
i said but do you do you call them two
18:57
days later to see how they're doing
19:00
no so what's that that's not that's not
19:03
i don't treat covet
19:04
that's i don't care anymore that's a
19:06
loss of compassion
19:08
so we have a crisis of compassion in our
19:10
country in the medical field that's in
19:12
our house right now
19:13
but for every doctor that's ever told a
19:15
patient that they don't treat covid
19:17
okay but then they call them two days
19:19
later and help them get oxygen or see
19:21
how they're doing
19:22
if the answer is no that that's the
19:24
hippocratic oath going out
19:26
and that's on us and i'm telling you we
19:28
have a real self-check to do
19:30
uh in the house of medicine yep

1,925 posted on 03/25/2021 11:05:20 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1924 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote

Lol - mark for reading later...


1,926 posted on 03/25/2021 11:11:43 PM PDT by thesearethetimes... (Had I brought Christ with me, the outcome would have been different. Dr.Eric Cunningham)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1925 | View Replies]

To: thesearethetimes...

Because it’s so long, I post the transcript out in the sticks and post the link to the thread now on the forum. I forget people can even see things out here because I don’t watch ‘comments’ in the forum, I monitor articles.


1,927 posted on 03/25/2021 11:18:01 PM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1926 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Peter McCullough seems to be a very good doctor. He is exactly right that there is a major problem with doctors not living by the Hippocratic Oath. I always found it strange how early on they would push for "tests" before treatment . That isn't how medicine supposed to work. The doctor should give them a logical treatment and send test samples in.

Another example is the test for covid and many medical interments. For covid hey use a swab sanitized with Ethylene Oxide which is gives a very high chance of cancer according to the CDC. If I ever have to go too the doctor I'm going to tell them I'm allergic to Ethylene.
https://www.cdc.gov/infectioncontrol/guidelines/disinfection/sterilization/ethylene-oxide.html

1,928 posted on 03/26/2021 1:33:41 AM PDT by Steve Van Doorn (*in my best Eric Cartman voice* 'I love you, guys')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1925 | View Replies]

 


VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination*
Vaccine/ToxoidEvent and interval** from vaccination
Tetanus in any combination; DTaP, DTP, DTP-Hib, DT, Td, TT, Tdap, DTaP-IPV, DTaP-IPV/Hib, DTaP-HepB-IPVA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7 days)
B.   Brachial neuritis (28 days)
C.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
D.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
E.   Any acute complications or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
F.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Pertussis in any combination; DTaP, DTP, DTP- Hib, Tdap, DTaP-IPV, DTaP-IPV/Hib, DTaP-HepB- IPVA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7 days)
B.   Encephalopathy or encephalitis (7 days)
C.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
D.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
E.   Any acute complications or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
F.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Measles, mumps and rubella in any combination; MMR,  MMRV, MMA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7 days)
B.   Encephalopathy or encephalitis (15 days)
C.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
D.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
E.   Any acute complications or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
F.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Rubella in any combination; MMR, MMRVA.   Chronic arthritis (42 days)
B.   Any acute complications or sequelae (including death) of above event (interval - not applicable)
C.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Measles in any combination; MMR, MMRV, MMA.   Thrombocytopenic purpura (7-30 days)
B.   Vaccine-strain measles viral infection in an immunodeficient recipient
o  Vaccine-strain virus identified (interval - not applicable)
o  If strain determination is not done or if laboratory testing is inconclusive (12 months)
C.   Any acute complications or sequelae (including
Vaccine/ToxoidEvent and interval** from vaccination
 death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
D.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Oral Polio (OPV)A.   Paralytic polio
o  in a non-immunodeficient recipient (30 days)
o  in an immunodeficient recipient (6 months)
o  in a vaccine-associated community case (interval - not applicable)
B.   Vaccine-strain polio viral infection
o  in a non-immunodeficient recipient (30 days)
o  in an immunodeficient recipient (6 months)
o  in a vaccine-associated community case (interval - not applicable)
C.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
D.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Inactivated Polio in any combination-IPV, DTaP- IPV, DTaP-IPV/Hib, DTaP-HepB-IPVA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7 days)
B.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
C.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
D.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of the above event (interval - not applicable)
E.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Hepatitis B in any combination- HepB, HepA-HepB, DTaP-HepB-IPV, Hib-HepBA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7 days)
B.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
C.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
D.   Any acute complications or sequelae (including death) of the above event (interval - not applicable)
E.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Haemophilus influenzae type b in any combination (conjugate)- Hib, Hib-HepB,  DTaP-IPV/Hib, Hib- MenCYA.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
B.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
C.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
D.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine
Vaccine/ToxoidEvent and interval** from vaccination
 (interval - see package insert)
Varicella in any combination- VAR, MMRVA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7 days)
B.   Disseminated varicella vaccine-strain viral disease.
o  Vaccine-strain virus identified (time interval unlimited)
o  If strain determination is not done or if laboratory testing is inconclusive (42 days)
C.   Varicella vaccine-strain viral reactivation (time interval unlimited )
D.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
E.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
F.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
G.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Rotavirus (monovalent or pentavalent) RV1, RV5A.   Intussusception (21 days)
B.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
C.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Pneumococcal conjugate(7-valent or 13-valent) PCV7, PCV13A.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
B.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
C.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
D.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Hepatitis A in any combination- HepA, HepA-HepBA.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
B.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
C.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
D.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Seasonal influenza--trivalent inactivated influenza, quadrivalent inactivated influenza, live attenuatedA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7 days)
B.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
C.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
Vaccine/ToxoidEvent and interval** from vaccination
influenza-IIV, IIV3, IIV4, RIV3, ccIIV3, LAIV4D.   Guillain-Barré Syndrome  (42 days)
E.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
F.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Meningococcal - MCV4, MPSV4, Hib-MenCY, MenACWY, MenBA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7 days)
B.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration. (7 days)
C.   Vasovagal syncope  (7 days)
D.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
E.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Human Papillomavirus (Quadrivalent, Bivalent, or 9 valent) - 9vHPV, 4vHPV, 2vHPVA.   Anaphylaxis or anaphylactic shock (7days)
B.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
C.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
D.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
E.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
Any new vaccine recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention for routine administration to childrenA.   Shoulder Injury Related to Vaccine Administration (7 days)
B.   Vasovagal syncope (7 days)
C.   Any acute complication or sequelae (including death) of above events (interval - not applicable)
D.   Events described in manufacturer’s package insert as contraindications to additional doses of vaccine (interval - see package insert)
* Effective date:  March 21, 2017. The Reportable Events Table (RET) reflects what is reportable by law (42 USC 300aa-25) to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) including conditions found in the manufacturer package insert. In addition, healthcare professionals are encouraged to report any clinically significant or unexpected events (even if not certain the vaccine caused the event) for any vaccine, whether or not it is listed on the RET. Manufacturers are also required by regulation (21CFR 600.80) to report to the VAERS program all adverse events made known to them for any vaccine.
Note that the RET differs from the Vaccine Injury Table (VIT) regarding timeframes of adverse events. Timeframes listed on the RET reflect what is required for reporting, but not what is required for compensation.
To view timeframes for compensation, please see the VIT at
VAERS Table of Reportable Events Following Vaccination* 
Vaccine/ToxoidEvent and interval** from vaccination 
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/vaccineinjurytable.pdf
**Represents the onset interval between vaccination and the adverse event. For a detailed explanation of terms, see the Vaccine Injury Table at
https://www.hrsa.gov/vaccinecompensation/vaccineinjurytable.pdf
 
A list of vaccine abbreviations is located at: https://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/terms/vacc-abbrev.html

1,929 posted on 03/29/2021 2:14:44 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ransomnote
Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) Standard Operating Procedures for COVID-19 (as of 4 December 2020) (cdc.gov)

Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS)

Standard Operating Procedures for COVID-19 (as of 4 December 2020)

VAERS Team

Immunization Safety Office, Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion National Center for Emerging and Zoonotic Infectious Diseases Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

Table of Contents

Disclaimer                                                                                                                     3

Executive Summary                                                                                                      3

1.0 Introduction                                                                                                           3

COVID-19 vaccines                                                               12

3.0  Coordination and Collaboration                                                                          18

but not abstract, and identifying PTs                                                 28

5.0 References                                                                                                           30

 

Disclaimer

 

This document is a draft planning document for internal use by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, with collaborating contractors. Numerous aspects (including but not limited to specific adverse events to be monitored, timeframes for report processing, data elements to be reported, and data analysis) are dynamic and subject to change without notice.

 

Executive Summary

 

CDC and FDA will perform routine VAERS surveillance to identify potential new safety concerns for COVID-19 vaccines. This surveillance will include generating tables summarizing automated data from fields on the VAERS form for persons who received COVID-19 vaccines (e.g., age of vaccinee, COVID-19 vaccine type, adverse event).

 

Enhanced surveillance (i.e., automated data and clinical review) will be implemented after reports of the following adverse events of special interest (AESIs): death, COVID- 19 disease, Guillain-Barre Syndrome (GBS), seizure, stroke, narcolepsy/cataplexy, anaphylaxis, vaccination during pregnancy, acute myocardial infarction, myopericarditis, coagulopathy (including thrombocytopenia, disseminated intravascular coagulopathy [DIC], and deep venous thrombosis [DVT]), Kawasaki’s disease, multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in children (MIS-C), multisystemic inflammatory syndrome in adults (MIS-A), and transverse myelitis. Abstraction of medical records associated with reports of these conditions will be performed using an internal CDC website (i.e., behind CDC’s firewall). Data entered into the abstraction website will be stored on CDC servers and used to populate data tables, from which automated reports will be generated and analyzed on a periodic basis. Enhanced surveillance (i.e., automated data and clinical review) will also be implemented after reports of pregnancy complications, stillbirths, congenital anomalies, and vaccination errors. However, abstraction of medical records after these conditions will be performed on an as needed basis. These efforts will assist in CDC’s efforts to monitor the safety of COVID-19 vaccines.

 

1.0     Introduction

 

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) use the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) as a front-line system to monitor the safety of vaccines licensed for use in the United States. In addition to conducting general surveillance, each year VAERS activities focus on new formulations and types of vaccine, new populations who may be vaccinated because of changes in licensed indications or Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) recommendations, and any new safety concerns identified. This Standard Operating Procedures (SOP) document describes the following activities for COVID-19 vaccine safety monitoring:

 

 

 

 

 

 

The VAERS Team within CDC’s Immunization Safety Office (ISO)

 

This SOP does not describe details of FDA surveillance procedures for COVID-19 vaccine safety or CDC surveillance or evaluation of COVID-19 vaccines in systems other than VAERS.

 

[Placeholder for section describing individual COVID-19 vaccines when available]

 

 

For each adverse event of special interest (AESI), the rationale for enhanced monitoring, case definitions (if available), and references are provided in Table 1:

 

Table 1: Adverse Events of Special Interest, with case definitions (if available)

 

Adverse Event of Special Interest

Rationale for enhanced monitoring

Case definition (if available)*

References

Acute myocardial infarction (AMI)

·      Has been reported as a presenting sign of COVID-19 disease and could indicate VAED

·      International consensus case definition available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub

/10.1161/CIR.0000000000000617

·         https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc

/articles/PMC7179991/

 

 

 

 

Anaphylaxis

·      Can represent a severe allergy of life-threatening severity

·

·      Brighton Collaboration case definition available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc e/article/pii/S0264410X07002642?via

%3Dihub

·         https://www.sciencedirect.com/sci ence/article/pii/S00916749193002 0X?via%3Dihub

Coagulopathy

·      Thrombocytopenia, DIC, and DVT have all been reported as part of COVID-19 disease and could indicate VAED

·         Brighton Collaboration case definition for thrombocytopenia available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/scien ce/article/pii/S0264410X0700268X? via%3Dihub

·         Scientific Standardization Committee of the International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis scoring for DIC available at https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/ful l/10.1080/17474086.2018.1500173

 

·      Modified Wells’ score (widely acknowledged standard for DVT/PE) available at

https://academic.oup.com/clinchem/ar ticle/57/9/1256/5620938

·         https://www.thelancet.com/journal s/lanhae/article/PIIS2352- 3026(20)30151-4/fulltext

 

 

 

 

COVID-19

disease

·      COVID-19 disease can be an indication of vaccine failure

 

·      Severe COVID-19 disease can be an indication of vaccine-enhanced disease (VAED)

·      CSTE case definition for COVID-19 available at https://wwwn.cdc.gov/nndss/conditio ns/coronavirus-disease-2019-covid- 19/case-definition/2020/08/05/

·      Pre-publication Brighton case definition for VAED available at https://brightoncollaboration.us/vaed/

·         https://www.nature.com/articles/d4 1587-020-00016-w

Death

·      Public interest in deaths after vaccination, especially in children (<18 years of age) and recipients of newly licensed vaccines

·      Report of death certificate or autopsy report

·         https://academic.oup.com/cid/articl e/61/6/980/451431

GBS

·      Is a vaccine-associated adverse event of historical interest

·      Brighton Collaboration case definition available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc e/article/pii/S0264410X1000798X?vi a%3Dihub

·         https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety

/concerns/guillain-barre- syndrome.html

Kawasaki’s disease

·      Could be confused with MIS-C, which could be an indication of VAED

·      CDC case definition available at https://www.cdc.gov/kawasaki/case- definition.html

·         https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum es/69/wr/mm6932e2.htm

 

 

 

 

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS- C)

·      Could be an indication of VAED

·      Interim case definition available at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/ 69/wr/mm6932e2.htm

·         https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum es/69/wr/mm6932e2.htm

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A)

·      Could be an indication of VAED

·      Interim case definition available at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/ 69/wr/mm6940e1.htm

·         https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volum es/69/wr/mm6940e1.htm

Myopericarditis

·      Has been reported as part of COVID-19 disease pathology and could indicate VAED

·      Joint Smallpox Vaccine Safety Working Group of the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) and the Armed Forces Epidemiology Board (AFEB) case definition available at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/PDF/wk/ mm5221.pdf (p. 494)

·         https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc

/articles/PMC7199677/

Narcolepsy/ Cataplexy

·      Has been alleged as an adverse event associated with some adjuvanted vaccines; some COVID-19 vaccines might employ adjuvants

·      Brighton Collaboration case definition available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc e/article/pii/S0264410X12017811?via

%3Dihub

·      https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety

/concerns/history/narcolepsy- flu.html

·         https://www.hhs.gov/about/news/2 020/07/31/hhs-dod-partner-sanofi- gsk-commercial-scale- manufacturing-demonstration- project-produce-millions-covid- 19-investigational-vaccine- doses.html

 

 

 

 

Vaccination during pregnancy

·      Public interest and concern over adverse pregnancy events and fetal outcomes

·      Report of vaccinated person being pregnant (during or after vaccination)

·     http://www.sciencedirect.com/scie nce/article/pii/S000293781001105 1

·

Seizure

·      Is a vaccine-associated adverse event of historical interest

 

·      In young patients (i.e., 5 years and

younger) might indicate febrile seizure

·      Brighton Collaboration case definition available at https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc e/article/pii/S0264410X03006613?via

%3Dihub

·      https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety

/concerns/febrile-seizures.html

Stroke

·      Has been reported with COVID-19 disease and might therefore be an indication of VAED

 

·      Was also reported in a COVID-19 vaccine prelicensure clinical trial

·      American Heart Association/American Stroke Association consensus definition available at https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/epub

/10.1161/STR.0b013e318296aeca

·      https://jamanetwork.com/journals/j amaneurology/fullarticle/2768098

·      https://www.washingtonpost.com/ health/2020/10/23/jj-vaccine-trial- to-resume/

Transverse myelitis

·      One report of transverse myelitis observed in prelicensure clinical trial of ChAdOx1 nCoV-19 vaccine.

·      No case definition exists; will track on the basis of physician diagnosis

·      https://www.npr.org/sections/coron avirus-live- updates/2020/09/12/912281381/ast razeneca-resumes-its-covid-19- vaccine-trials-in-the-u-k

 

For details on the background, historical perspective and specific aims of VAERS surveillance, access https://www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/ensuringsafety/monitoring/vaers/index.html.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

In addition, selected AESIs will be monitored for awareness but not abstracted. These AESIs and available case definitions are listed in Table 2:

 

Table 2: AESIs to monitor (but not abstract), with definitions and available case definitions

 

AESIs to monitor but not abstract*

Reference definitions and available case definitions

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

https://www.thoracic.org/professionals/career-development/residents- medical-students/ats-reading-list/adult/ards.php

Autoimmune disorders

Appendix 4.6 lists specific disorders to monitor

Other clinically serious neurologic AEs:

 

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)

Sejvar et al (2007)

Multiple sclerosis (MS)

NIH (last updated 5 Aug 2019)

Optic neuritis (ON)

Guier et al (last updated 10 Aug 2020)

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)

Gogia et al (last updated 9 Oct 2020)

Encephalitis

Sejvar et al (2007)

Myelitis

Sejvar et al (2007)

Encephalomyelitis

Merriam Webster (last accessed 7 Nov 2020)

Meningoencephalitis

Merriam-Webster (last accessed 7 Nov 2020)

Meningitis

CDC (last updated 21 Jan 2020)

Encephalopathy

NIH (last updated 27 Mar 2019)

Ataxia

Johns Hopkins Medicine Dept of Neurology and Neurosurgery (last accessed 7 Nov 2020)

Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions

Varies with specific symptom; see Appendix 4.6

Vaccination errors

See Section 4.4

 

 

2.0     Overview of VAERS Surveillance Activities

 

The specific tasks and frequency of these tasks for surveillance will be adjusted to meet public health needs, with consideration of staff time and resources. For example, in the event of a significant increase in the number of adverse events (AEs) reported to VAERS that warrant clinical review, additional ISO staff will be assigned to perform reviews. An algorithm of the process to monitor vaccine AEs is shown in Appendix 4.1.

 

CDC will perform clinical reviews for AESIs listed in Table 1. Results from automated data assessment will identify additional conditions potentially warranting further clinical review.

 

CDC will perform Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR) analysis (see section 2.3.1, p. 14), excluding laboratory results, to identify AEs that are disproportionately reported relative to other AEs.

 

FDA routinely reviews all serious* and other medically important condition (OMIC) reports daily and performs data mining.

 

 

Summaries (or other deliverables, as needed) will be based on data processing, coding and follow-up, automated data, and clinical review, as well as field investigations as appropriate. COVID-19 vaccine safety coordination meetings among ISO team members and FDA will be scheduled weekly (or more frequently, as needed) to discuss results of the automated data and (if indicated) clinical review.

 

 

2.1     Data processing and coding and follow-up

 

The CDC contractor for VAERS receives, processes, and manages VAERS reports. The contractor receives reports online and by mail, fax, or telephone. Using standard procedures, contractor staff will review each U.S. report following COVID-19 vaccines and assign standard codes to each reported sign, symptom, and diagnosis using Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology [10]. The staff will enter all MedDRA terms and other information from each VAERS report form into a computerized database. Vaccine type codes in the VAERS database are shown in Appendix 4.2.

 

Trained contractor staff will request additional information including hospital records and autopsy reports when appropriate (Appendices 4.3 and 4.4). Medical records are routinely requested for all serious reports, including deaths.

 

 

Contractor clinical staff will summarize data and assign additional MedDRA codes for symptoms, signs, and diagnoses identified from the requested additional information.

 

They will then add these additional codes to the data originally entered into the database for the specific VAERS report.

 

Table 3 lists the AESIs for which medical records will be requested and reviewed. Manual review of serious reports is routinely performed by FDA (a more in-depth clinical review will be performed by CDC as indicated).

 

Table 3: AESIs for which medical records will be requested and reviewed

 

AESI

Medical and vaccination records obtained by contractor

Clinical review by CDC*

Acute Myocardial Infarction (AMI)

 

 

 

 

 

All reports (including manufacturer reports)

 

 

 

 

 

All reports (including manufacturer reports)

Anaphylaxis

Coagulopathy

COVID-19 disease

Death

GBS

Kawasaki’s disease

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-C)

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-A)

Myopericarditis

Narcolepsy/ Cataplexy

Non-Death Serious

All reports (including manufacturer reports)

As needed

Pregnancy and Prespecified Conditions

 

All reports (including manufacturer reports)

 

All reports (including manufacturer reports)

Seizure/Convulsion

Stroke

Transverse myelitis

 

*Includes review of VAERS form and available medical records by primary ISO staff. Initial review will be performed and documented within CDC internal COVID-19 medical abstraction website. More detailed review will be performed as needed

 

All COVID-19 vaccine reports will be entered into the VAERS database and assigned a unique identifying (ID) VAERS number during normal business hours. The contractor will send daily e-mail alerts (Daily Priority Reports) to CDC/FDA with a list of VAERS ID numbers for all serious and non-serious reports of adverse events of special interest (AESIs) after COVID-19 vaccines. Reports of AESIs will be identified in the Daily Priority Reports and in a daily table (to be constructed, as described in section 2.4).

Appendix 4.3 provides details on how the prespecified conditions will be identified by the contractor.

 

2.1.1      Jurisdiction-specific data in VAERS reports after COVID-19 vaccines

 

ISO will make selected VAERS data available to Vaccine Safety Coordinators (VSCs) in requesting jurisdictions on a weekly basis via Epi-X. The selected data will include the following:

 

 

 

 

Residence within a local jurisdiction will be determined in similar fashion, based upon city and ZIP code information comprising the local jurisdiction.

 

Weekly redacted data will be made available publicly via CDC WONDER (https://wonder.cdc.gov/), HHS (https://vaers.hhs.gov ), and Epi-X on the same date. Case counts on Epi-X and public websites should be equal; any differences in case counts may result from data processing (e.g., data cleaning) and will be reconciled as the data mature.

 

2.1.2. Vaccination Errors

 

Reports of vaccination errors will be identified by conducting an automated search using MedDRA preferred terms (PTs) and organized into vaccination error groups shown in Appendix 4.5.

 

 

 

Vaccination errors will be summarized by vaccination error group based on automated data and include any error involving COVID-19 vaccines and any other coadministered vaccine(s). Clinical review of VAERS reports will be performed for vaccination error reports that are classified as serious (see p.11) , and vaccination error PTs with elevated PRRs.

 

The data from this automated search will be provided as a weekly automated table that will be reviewed as described below in sections 2.4 and 3.0.

 

2.2     Automated tables:

 

A series of tables will be generated using the VAERS automated data.

 

2.2.1      VAERS daily table

 

A version of the cumulative count tables from section 2.1.1 will be refreshed daily for internal use (i.e., inside ISO). This version will be generated independently of the jurisdictional Epi-X/CDC WONDER data and will be almost identical in appearance and content, except that the data will be presented in aggregate and not at the local level..

Because this internal version will use supplemental data not for public release, counts may vary from counts on Epi-X/CDC WONDER.

 

2.2.2      VAERS weekly tables

 

Data tables demonstrating frequency, reporting ratios and general characteristics will be generated automatically using pre-defined variables populated by VAERS data. The data in these tables will be summarized by whether the AE is classified as serious and by age group and sex, and will be presented in weekly and cumulative formats.

 

The following weekly tables will be available every Monday (data as of the previous Friday):

 

Table 1. All reports following COVID-19 vaccines by severity and selected manufacturer/brand name

 

AESI tables

 

Table 2. Top 25 most frequently reported AEs

 

Table 3. Reports of the following AESIs after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines, stratified by age group (ages <18 years, 18–49 years, 50–64 years, 65–74 years, 75+ years, unreported):

 

 

Table 4. Reporting trends of the following AESIs after vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines, stratified

by age group (<12 months, 12–35 months, 36–59 months, 5–11 years, 12–20 years, >20 years, unreported)

 

 

Table 5. Reporting trends of VACCINATION DURING PREGNANCY following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines stratified by age group (ages <18 years, 18–29 years, 30–39 years, 40–49 years, ≥50 years, unreported)

 

Table 6. Reporting trends of Autoimmune Disorders by System Organ Class following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines by age group (ages <18 years, 18–49 years, 50–64 years, 65–74 years, 75+ years, unreported)

 

Table 7. Reporting trends of AESIs to monitor but not abstract (Table 2, p. 8), following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines by age group (ages <18 years, 18–49 years, 50–64 years, 65–74 years, 75+ years, unreported)

 

Table 8. Vaccination errors

 

Table 9, 10, etc. PRRs (number of tables TBD)

 

 

2.3     Signal detection methods and data analyses

 

The analyses for COVID-19 vaccine safety signals will focus on identifying deviations from preliminary safety data, and possibly from other vaccines, using disproportionality analyses and comparisons of reporting rates.

 

Two main approaches to data mining are Proportional Reporting Ratios (PRRs) and Empirical Bayesian Geometric Means [11–13]. Both have published literature suggesting criteria for detecting “signals” [14]. PRR will be used at CDC for potential signal detection; Empirical Bayesian data mining will be performed by FDA.

 

After initial licensure or approval of COVID-19 vaccines in the United States, initial reports may be too few to allow for data mining immediately. As the data mature, PRR and Empirical Bayesian data mining can then be used.

 

2.3.1      Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR)

 

CDC will perform PRR data mining on a weekly basis or as needed. PRRs compare the proportion of a specific AE following a specific vaccine versus the proportion of the same AE following receipt of another vaccine (see equation below Table 4). A safety signal is defined as a PRR of at least 2, chi-squared statistic of at least 4, and 3 or more cases of the AE following receipt of the specific vaccine of interest.

 

CDC will apply appropriate comparator vaccines (e.g., adjuvanted vaccines like Shingrix and/or Fluad for adjuvanted COVID-19 vaccines) and adjust for severity and age distributions where applicable.

 

 

Table 4. Calculation of Proportional Reporting Ratio (PRR)

 

 

Specific AE

All other AE

Specific vaccine

A

B

All other vaccines

C

D

 

PRR = [a/(a+b)]

[c/(c+d)]

 

 

2.3.2      Data mining

 

FDA will perform data mining at least biweekly (with stratified data mining monthly) using empirical Bayesian data mining to identify AEs reported more frequently than expected following vaccination with COVID-19 vaccines, using published criteria [12, 14]. Vaccine product-specific AE pairs following specific COVID-19 vaccines with reporting proportions at least twice that of other vaccines in the VAERS database (i.e., lower bound of the 90% confidence interval of the Empirical Bayesian Geometric Mean [EB05] >2) will be evaluated. Data mining runs can be adjusted and/or stratified by possible confounding variables such as age, sex, season of administration, and type of vaccines. FDA and CDC will share and discuss results of data mining analyses and signals.

 

2.3.3      Crude reporting rates

 

If needed for internal purposes, crude reporting rates will be calculated based on COVID- 19 vaccine doses distributed, when a source of doses distributed data becomes available.

 

2.4     Review of VAERS forms, medical records, and automated tables for reports of interest

 

 

 

 

 

 

 
  

 

 

Figure: abstraction process

 

MedDRA terms identified as safety signals due to elevated PRR and/or a stastistically significant finding on data mining will be reviewed as appropriate. The pattern or trend of PRR and data mining results over a period of time (e.g., several weeks) will be monitored before initiating a clinical review. Other factors, such as clinical importance, whether AEs are unexpected, seriousness, and whether a specific syndrome or diagnosis is identified rather than non-specific symptoms will be considered in determining if clinical review will be performed.

 

Identification of a cluster of reports or unexpected AEs will be further investigated, and additional information on serious AEs will be shared with CDC leadership. A list of lot numbers of vaccines that may be of concern will be requested from FDA. In the event of review of difficult or rare cases, subject matter experts (e.g., neurologist, the Clinical Immunization Safety Assessment network) may be consulted.

 

Clinical review will include reviewing reports (and associated medical records) containing the identified MedDRA terms, confirming appropriate coding, confirming diagnosis (e.g., by applying a case definition), confirming time from vaccination to symptom onset, reviewing the patient history and course of illness to identify risk factors, and potentially comparing to comparable data for another vaccine.

 

A summary of the data review described in this section will be provided monthly, or as needed, to pertinent stakeholders (e.g., Immunization Safety Office leadership, FDA partners).

 

2.5     Signal assessment

 

Signal detection can occur in VAERS surveillance through FDA empirical Bayesian data mining, through CDC PRR data mining, and through descriptive analysis. When a potential signal is detected, ISO VAERS staff shall take a series of steps to assess the potential signal. Steps may include, but are not limited to:

 

 

If, after an initial assessment, VAERS investigators determine a signal warrants further investigation, the VAERS team lead will notify ISO leadership and develop a coordinated response plan. Any appropriate investigation will be conducted in collaboration with FDA. FDA will share with CDC reports of possible concern based of the data mining results and assess product-specific or lot safety as appropriate. ISO leadership will be responsible for notifying NCIRD and the CDC COVID-19 Vaccine Task Force (VTF) in a timely manner.

 

 

3.0     Coordination and Collaboration

 

Meetings and conference calls will be scheduled as follows, subject to change as needed:

 

 

 

3)              Weekly (or as needed) CDC/FDA COVID-19 Safety Coordination Meeting

with ISO leadership, NCIRD representatives, and FDA

  1. To present pertinent automated data and clinical summary (e.g., AEs resulting in signals) and FDA data mining results
  2. To provide updates on ISO VAERS team and FDA COVID-19 vaccine activities (e.g., scientific projects/publications, regulations, data from other vaccine safety systems)

 

4.0     Appendices

 

 
  

 

 

 

Vaccine type

CDC code

Notes

(Fill as appropriate)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Criteria

Actions/ Documents Requested

Description

Report Type

Vaccine Brand/Manufacturer

All

Serious

(including manufacturer reports)

Unknown/ Not Specified

Vaccination records

 

 

MedDRA Codes or Text Search

 

Acute Myocardial Infarction

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes:

Acute myocardial infarction Myocardial infarction Silent myocardial infarction

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

Anaphylaxis

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes: Anaphylactic reaction Anaphylactic shock Anaphylactoid reaction

Anaphylactoid shock

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

COVID-19 Disease

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

COVID-19

Asymptomatic COVID-19 COVID-19 pneumonia

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

Coagulopathy

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes:

Acquired amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia Amegakaryocytic thrombocytopenia

Axillary vein thrombosis Cavernous sinus thrombosis Cerebral venous thrombosis Deep vein thrombosis

Disseminated intravascular coagulation Embolism venous

Hepatic vein thrombosis Immune thrombocytopenia

Intracranial venous sinus thrombosis Mesenteric vein thrombosis

Portal vein thrombosis Pulmonary embolism

Pulmonary thrombosis

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

 

 

 

 

 

 

Pulmonary venous thrombosis

Severe fever with thrombocytopenia syndrome Subclavian vein thrombosis Thrombocytopenia

Thrombocytopenic purpura Thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura Thrombosis

Transverse sinus thrombosis Vena cava embolism

Vena cava thrombosis Venous thrombosis

 

GBS

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes: Guillian-Barre syndrome Miller Fisher syndrome

Demyelinating polyneuropathy

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records Do NOT fill out GBS questionnaire

Kawasaki Disease

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes: Kawasaki's disease

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Children (MIS-c)

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

Ages 0-20

AND

MedDRA Codes:

Multisystem inflammatory syndrome in children

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

Multisystem Inflammatory Syndrome in Adults (MIS-a)

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

Ages 21 and older

AND

MedDRA Codes: TBA

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

Myocarditis/Pericarditis

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes:

Atypical mycobacterium pericarditis Autoimmune myocarditis Autoimmune pericarditis

Bacterial pericarditis Coxsackie myocarditis Coxsackie pericarditis Cytomegalovirus myocarditis

Cytomegalovirus pericarditis Enterovirus myocarditis

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

 

 

 

 

 

 

Eosinophilic myocarditis Hypersensitivity myocarditis Immune-mediated myocarditis Myocarditis

Myocarditis bacterial Myocarditis helminthic Myocarditis infectious Myocarditis meningococcal Myocarditis mycotic Myocarditis post infection Myocarditis septic Pericarditis

Pericarditis adhesive Pericarditis constrictive Pericarditis helminthic Pericarditis infective Pericarditis mycoplasmal Pleuropericarditis Purulent pericarditis Viral myocarditis

Viral pericarditis

 

Narcolepsy/Cateplexy

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes: Narcolepsy Cataplexy

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

Pregnancy and Prespecified Conditions

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes: Abortion

Aborted pregnancy Abortion complete Abortion early Abortion incomplete Abortion late Abortion missed Abortion spontaneous

Abortion spontaneous complete Abortion spontaneous incomplete Abortion threatened

Congenital anomaly

Clinical follow-up including: prenatal visit documentation, delivery records, ER/hospital records during pregnancy, well child visits, infant hospitalization records; for congenital anomalies- infant records, ultrasounds,

genetic studies

 

 

 

 

 

 

Drug exposure during pregnancy Exposure during pregnancy Foetal death

Maternal exposure during pregnancy Stillbirth

OR

Text String:

Preg (Text String located in symptom_text, history, prex_illness)

OR

Pregnant Status (2.0 form-Q8)

OR

Congenital anomaly outcome (2.0 form-Q21)

Vaccination records

Seizure/Convulsion

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes:

Atonic seizures

Atypical benign partial epilepsy Autonomic seizure

Clonic convulsion Complex partial seizures Convulsion in childhood Convulsion

Convulsions local Epilepsy

Epileptic encephalopathy Febrile convulsion

Febrile infection-related epilepsy syndrome Generalised non-convulsive epilepsy Generalised onset non-motor seizure Generalised tonic-clonic seizure

Grand mal convulsion Idiopathic generalised epilepsy Myoclonic epilepsy

Neonatal seizure

Partial seizures with secondary generalisation Partial seizures

Petit mal epilepsy Seizure anoxic

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

 

 

 

 

 

 

Seizure cluster

Seizure like phenomena Seizure

Simple partial seizures Status epilepticus Temporal lobe epilepsy Tonic clonic movements Tonic convulsion

Tonic posturing

 

Stroke

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes:

Basal ganglia stroke Brain stem stroke Cerebellar stroke Cerebrovascular accident Embolic stroke Haemorrhagic stroke

Haemorrhagic transformation stroke Ischaemic stroke

Lacunar stroke Perinatal stroke Spinal stroke Thrombotic stroke

Vertebrobasilar stroke

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

Transverse myelitis

Serious/Non-serious

(including manufacturer reports)

MedDRA Codes: Myelitis transverse

Clinical follow-up Vaccination records

 

 

 

Type of report

Reported Vaccine

Serious reports

Serious follow-up initiation

Non-serious reports

Scan within

Complete process within3

Scan within

Complete process within3

1. US Deaths4

COVID-19

1

1

1

N/A

N/A

2. US Deaths4

Non-COVID-19

2

2

2

N/A

N/A

3. US/Foreign 5-day

All

2

2

N/A

N/A

N/A

4. US 15-day

All

2

2

N/A

N/A

N/A

5. US

COVID-195

2

3

3

2

5

6. US

Seasonal Influenza6,7

2

4

4

2

10

7. US 30-day

All

2

20

N/A

2

30

8. US

List A6

2

20

20

2

30

9. US

List B

2

30

20

2

45

10. Foreign Deaths

COVID-19

2

2

N/A

N/A

N/A

11. Foreign

COVID-19

2

30

N/A

5

120

12. Foreign

Non-COVID-19

5

90

N/A

5

120

 

  1. Subject to change in response to new public health policies and/or events and/or funding availability after discussion between CDC and FDA
  2. Not applicable for GBS reports where a patient is confined to facility longer than the time allowed for follow-up (e.g., patient in rehabilitation after GBS)
  3. Completion includes scanning, data entry, and coding
  4. If final autopsy report is not received within 2 months, make request every 2 months
  5. If no records received within 5 days from the original request, make another request for Covid-19
  6. If no records received within 7 days from the original request, make another request for Seasonal Influenza
  7. Seasonal influenza reports will be prioritized as stated in Row 4 until March 31, 2021. On April 1, 2021, process reports as stated in Row

 

 

 

 

 

List A

List B

HEPLISAV-B

Shingrix Gardasil 9 Yellow Fever

Other vaccines licensed in the U.S. for less than 12 months

Seasonal Influenza reports received after March 31, 2021

All vaccines excluding List A and Seasonal Influenza

 

4.5   Vaccination error groups and MedDRA Preferred Terms (PTs) for COVID-19 vaccination errors

 

 

 

Administration Errors

 

Contraindication to vaccination

 

Equipment

 

 

General

 

Inappropriate schedule of drug administration

 

Incorrect dose

 

Prescribing and dispensing

 

 

Product quality

 

 

Wrong Product

 

 

 

4.6   AESIs to monitor, but not abstract, and identifying PTs

 
  

 

VAERS COVID-19

Prespecified Conditio

 

(The embedded Excel spreadsheet documents PTs for all AESIs, both abstracted and monitored, but not asbtracted.)

 

AESI

Identifying MedDRA PT(s)

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome (ARDS)

Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome

Autoimmune disorders

[see embedded spreadsheet]

Other clinically serious neurologic AEs:

 

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM)

Acute disseminated encephalomyelitis

Multiple sclerosis (MS)

Multiple sclerosis Multiple sclerosis relapse

Primary progressive multiple sclerosis

Progressive multiple sclerosis Progressive relapsing multiple sclerosis

Relapsing multiple sclerosis Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis

Secondary progressive multiple sclerosis

Tumefactive multiple sclerosis

Optic neuritis (ON)

Optic neuritis

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)

Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy

Encephalitis

Encephalitis

Myelitis

Myelitis

Encephalomyelitis

Encephalomyelitis Leukoencephalomyelitis Noninfective encephalomyelitis

Meningoencephalitis

Meningoencephalitis viral

Meningitis

Meningitis Meningitis aseptic Meningitis viral

Encephalopathy

Encephalopathy

Leukoencephalopathy

Ataxia

Ataxia Cerebellar ataxia Cerebral ataxia

 

Non-anaphylactic allergic reactions

Allergic reaction to excipient Allergy to vaccine

Allergic bronchitis Allergic colitis Allergic cough Allergic cystitis Allergic gastroenteritis Allergic hepatitis Allergic keratitis Allergic pharyngitis

Allergic reaction to excipient Allergic respiratory disease Allergic respiratory symptom Allergic sinusitis Conjunctivitis allergic Dermatitis allergic Encephalitis allergic Encephalopathy allergic Laryngitis allergic

Nephritis allergic Pruritus allergic Rhinitis allergic Scleritis allergic

 

5.0 References

 

  1. Prevention and control of seasonal influenza with vaccines: Recommendations of the Advisory Committee on Immunizations Practices (ACIP)—United States, 2019-20 influenza season. Available at https://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/volumes/67/rr/pdfs/rr6703a1-H.pdf. Accessed on September 11, 2018.
  2. Flublok Quadrivalent [Package Insert] 2017, Protein Sciences: Meriden, CT. Available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProduct s/UCM619551.pdf. Accessed on September 11,
  3. Flucelvax Quadrivalent [Package Insert] 2017, Seqirus: USA. Available at https://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/Vaccines/ApprovedProduct s/UCM619588.pdf. Accessed on September 11,
  4. Fluad [Package Insert] 2017, Sequris: USA. Available at http://www.fda.gov/downloads/BiologicsBloodVaccines/SafetyAvailability/VaccineS afety/UCM474387.pdf. Accessed on September 11,
  5. Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) form. Available at https://vaers.hhs.gov/uploadFile/index.jsp. Accessed on September 11,
  6. Shimabukuro T, Nguyen M, Martin D, DeStefano F. Safety monitoring in the Vaccine Adverse Reporting System (VAERS). Vaccine 2015 Aug 6;33(36):4398- 405.
  7. Moro PL, Li R, Haber P, Weintraub E, Cano M. Surveillance systems and methods for monitoring the post-marketing safety of influenza vaccines at the Centers for Control and Prevention. Expert Opin Drug Saf 2016 Sep;15(9):1175-83.
  8. Varricchio F, Iskander J, DeStefano F, Ball R, Pless R, Braun MM, et al. Understanding vaccine safety information from the vaccine adverse event reporting system. Pediatr Infect Dis J 2004;23:287–94.
  9. Vellozzi C, KR Broder, P Haber et al. Adverse events following influenza A (H1N1) 2009 monovalent vaccines reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System, United States, October 1, 2009–January 31, 2010. Vaccine 2010;28(45):7248-55.
  10. Medical Dictionary for Regulatory Activities terminology (MedDRA) https://www.meddra.org/.
  11. Evans SJ, Waller PC, Davis S. Use of proportional reporting ratios (PRRs) for single generation from spontaneous adverse drug reaction reports. Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf 2001;10:483-6.
  12. DuMouchel W. Bayesian data mining in large frequency tables with an application to the FDA spontaneous reporting system. Am Stat 1999;53:177-90.
  13. Almenoff JS. Innovations for the future of pharmacovigilance. Drug Saf 2007;30: 631-3.
  14. Szarfman A, Machado SG, O’Neill RT. Use of screening algorithms and computer systems to efficiently signal higher-than-expected combinations of drugs and events in the US FDA’s spontaneous reporting system. Drug Saf 2002;25(6):381-92.

1,930 posted on 03/29/2021 2:42:42 AM PDT by ransomnote (IN GOD WE TRUST)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1929 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 1,861-1,8801,881-1,9001,901-1,9201,921-1,930 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson