That’s rather amateurish and naive analysis. The Soviets were well-aided by the allies in the west getting across the Rhine in March and running wild deep into Germany. In fact, Eisenhower pulled up just short of Berlin and left it to the Soviets to clear.
Getting across the Rhine made the Soviet task orders of magnitude easier.
Why would you act like that seriously brave act was nothing?
The Germans knew how badly that crossing would hurt them and they threw everything but the kitchen sink at that bridge. V-2 rockets, the few jet bombers they could find, and every soldier they could muster to that area.
They knew stopping that crossing was critical to giving them breathing room to stop the Russians.
Bradley told Eisenhower trying to race the Soviets to Berlin, from farther away than where they sat on the Oder, could cost another 100k Western Allied casualties, for ground they had already agreed to cede to Soviet occupation.
What formations were sent from the Eastern Front to the Western Front after the Ludendorff bridge fell to the Americans? The Germans always had the bulk of their military facing East. They could have put the entirety of their forces in March '45 on the Eastern Front and been unable to stop the Red Army.
Why would you act like that seriously brave act was nothing?
It didn't change the outcome of the war. The Soviets were massing for their last offensive and getting to Berlin regardless of the bridge over the Rhine. It's not that the attackers were not brave, it's just that it was moot regarding the war's end.
The Western Allies liberation of Western Europe was fantastic for Western Europeans post war, but it wasn't determinative regarding the outcome of the war.