Replies

The proponents of the vaccine need to prove it safe, both short and long term.

They have and you know it. The FDA has approved three vaccines after extensive double blind, randomized trials. Don't be cute.

You next quote a wall of words from the disingenuous article, none of them backing up your claim that the Ministry of Health said the vaccine killed more than 40 times the number of people than would have died without the vaccine. As I said, you can't point me to anything they've said that doesn't directly contradict your claim.

In fact, what you posted proves my point. The "researchers" complain that the Ministry doesn't understand it's own numbers, only these three idiots do.

So, that destroys your claim that the vax is 100% effective.

LOL. I see your habit of making things up about what others have said isn't limited to the Ministry of Health.

They have and you know it. The FDA has approved three vaccines after extensive double blind, randomized trials. Don't be cute.

They haven't and WE know it. Military personal are refusing to take the vaccine because it is still EXPERIMENTAL, was only approved for EMERGENCY USE, As formal FDA approval is YEARS AWAY:
https://www.thenation.com/article/society/military-covid-vaccine/
EMERGENCY USE was approved due to 1) hysteria caused by gross over inflation of the number of people dying from Covid, 2) suppression of cheap, effective treatments like HCQ and ivermectin, and 3) suppressing or misrepresenting the actual results of the trials, including the adverse effects of the millions who have now participated as human guinea pigs in the experiment. What it is. People like you want to believe in RAINBOWS AND UNICORNS, i.e., that some magic solution exists to a virus that is extremely rarely deadly. If you want to be a human guinea pig it's your choice. The problem is that you want to impose your naivete on others, including helpless vulnerable elderly people living in institutions, or women of child bearing age who might become infertile. That's wrong.

You next quote a wall of words from the disingenuous article, none of them backing up your claim that the Ministry of Health said the vaccine killed more than 40 times the number of people than would have died without the vaccine

Uh, sorry you can't understand what you read, or anything you don't want to believe becomes a "wall of words" which you choose not to understand. What the authors wrote is that IMH conducted a trial of the vaccine on a group of people. The data provided in the tables clearly showed that the results that hundreds of people died after taking the vaccine. Yet, the text explained this away as people who hadn't received the vaccine. So, the IMH report CONTRADICTED ITSELF, in an illogical way. Either the IMH conducted a trial of the Pfizer vaccine on people or it didn't. Writing that the people in the trial who died, hadn't received the vaccine is absurd. Of course, for people like you who want to believe all of the BS choose to just ignore that.

As I said, you can't point me to anything they've said that doesn't directly contradict your claim.

Again, it's not my claim. The critical analysis of the IMH's data comes from Hervé Seligmann and Haim Yativ, who appear to be very respected professionals. Their analysis has not been rebutted. You have not supported your claim of your irrational belief of a magic harmless vaccine for a very treatable virus. Please tell us more about the beautiful rainbows and unicorns in your world!