Posted on 03/07/2021 9:18:58 AM PST by crz
No, it’s a weather system.
And don’t call me Shirley.
Man made Gorebull warming is, as we all know it, a bald faced lie.
This pacific region determines weather patterns across the globe. Couple that with the lack of sunspots and volcanic activity and those are the determining factors for global weather.
The effect seems to be waning to me.
How presumptive. Why isn’t it La Nino? Or Il Nino? Or just Nxnx?
The heat capacity of 0.01% increase of CO2 vastly overwhelms the heat absorbed by the tropical oceans
What????
Cooler oceanic temperatures? Does this mean less hurricane development? We had five named storms hit Louisiana last year. And no, I am not in favor of hurricanes. So if my low tech brain is reading this high tech news right, that’s good news.
Shirley you jest. 😉
It may have some effect on the Atlantic but as I understand it El Nino and La Nina are mostly Pacific Ocean weather patterns. El Nino brings lots of rain to the west coast of the Americas (and California can use it). La Nina is the opposite - brings dry conditions. But someone should check my math.
Historical El Niño and La Niña Episodes
Go to that graph and look back in the history of hurricane development during those periods of La Nina.
Expect to see a hell of a lot of severe tornado activity though.
From people who can’t tell you the weather tomorrow.
An Engineer’s Explanation of Climate Change
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2017/04/09/an-engineers-explanation-of-climate-change/
"...La Niña events punctuate the above described processes [El Nino] and result from coherently timed gravitational perturbations that happen to interfere destructively, squelching a previous resonance."
From section below:
Annual and Decadal Time Scales
The feebly held latch of this current Holocene solar-albedo high-temperature interglacial is sustained by a regular and currently ongoing diet of El Niño (and other) internal energy release events. When El Niño (and other) events are stronger or more frequent, the global average surface temperature goes up. And when El Niño (and other) events are weaker or less frequent, the global average surface temperature goes down. According to the theory herein, these El Niño (and other) events are the result of gravitationally induced resonant modulations of Earth’s internal energy release.
I think I’m being charitable in asserting that the currently espoused explanations regarding El Niño events are likely off base. They simply violate the laws of thermodynamics. In one explanation it is asserted that changes to prevailing winds shepherd equatorially warmed waters to the Western Pacific; but to a higher temperature than they ever were as equatorial solar heated waters. In another explanation warm equatorial waters are subducted and travel a subsea route only to be upwelled in the West Pacific; but again at a higher temperature than they were ever at while being solar equatorially heated. It is obvious that non-solar volcanic heat has been added to these waters.
Let me now hypothesize a localization of bulk-Earthresonance that has been happening periodically throughout the Holocene. Suppose that there is a deep magma plume that is equatorially located North of Australia. This is where the warm water upwellings of El Niño always begin. And suppose that at the crust/sea interface above this plume there is an expansive field of subsea volcanos (there in fact is such an enormous field); some small portion of which have reached the sea surface creating the volcanic islands that exist there. This geography is flanked with an Indian Ocean to the West and the Pacific Ocean to the East. Critically, it also boarders the Mariana Trench, the deepest known part of the global oceans. This geography is a prime structure for absorbing gravitationally induced orbital kinetics into localized bulkEarth-resonance to stimulate volcanic release (trench curving may likely be important to accepting a broad-band range of kinetic frequency/oscillation angles).
Here is one scenario of the many possible. It is inevitably so that an opposition with Mars will pull the Earth/Moon’s orbital path(s) slightly outward imparting a slight eccentricity to the Earth/Moon’s orbital path(s) (call this a 1-conjunction event). These 1-conjunction events happen all the time, with Mars as well as with the other planetary neighbors, and are of no climatic consequence. It takes a minimum of two coherently timed events to incite an orbital path resonance.
However, occasionally this Mars opposition is followed several days or months later (a resonant halfperiod later) by a 2nd coherently timed conjunction with Venus pulling the Earth/Moon’s orbital path(s) more than just slightly inward (call this now a 2-conjunction event). These coherent 2-conjunction events are able to incite a modest orbital path resonance and the energy of this displacement is dissipated through modest Earthly deformation with likely detectable climatic effect (a low energy El Niño event).
But occasionally these two conjunctions are followed several days or months later by a coherently timed 3rd opposition with Jupiter pulling the Earth/Moon’s orbital path much more than slightly back outward (call this now a 3-conjunction event). Earthly deformation now has to dissipate a great deal of resonant energy in addition to the stimulated internal Earthly energy release. Significant climatic effects likely result (a high energy El Niño event). A 4th possible event might be an opposition with Saturn that could also be coherently timed.
La Niña events punctuate the above described processes and result from coherently timed gravitational perturbations that happen to interfere destructively, squelching a previous resonance. And it’s when a preponderance of these destructive gravitational interference events occurs that a 1 or 2 degree downward step toward major glaciation takes place. Constructive interference is the norm, except when it isn’t.
The effects of those are felt worldwide.
Takes some research to determine what the weather was in areas during both La Nina and El Nino years.
Will find out that the UK and Europe has historically had nasty winter weather during La Nina years?
If you’ve a better research link please feel free to post it.
BTW, they are not predicting anything. They are just showing what is what in the pacific.
The NOAAs claims about Gorebull warming is a political scam..that I will agree with totally.
Down in Florida one week they predicted sunny weather all weekend. The weekend got there, and they changed it to “heavy rains “ for the weekend. They can’t even predict what the weather will do 4 to 5 days out many times sometimes they get lucky though.
I’m angry at Earth cycles. There ought to be a law!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.