Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Is Concealing the Mental Incompetency of a Candidate and/or President Treason?
Jewish Righter | March 3, 2021 | JewishRighter

Posted on 03/03/2021 7:13:46 AM PST by JewishRighter

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last
To: JewishRighter

Dr. Jill, the media, the Dem insiders pulling his strings, are all culpable in this massive coverup to put America at severe risk. Biden has severe mental cognitive issues, to not focus on this is a crime.


21 posted on 03/03/2021 7:46:25 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

Those who were duped into voting for him will never admit how stupid they look now.


22 posted on 03/03/2021 7:54:39 AM PST by Chauncey Gardiner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: G Larry
......everyone knows Biden is mentally incompetent.... the people behind his campaign and surrounding him now are
pulling off a gigantic fraud and are usurping the power of the Presidency of the United States.....

SOURCE https://www.law.cornell.edu/constitution-conan/article-2/section-3/the-president-as-law-enforcer

Powers Derived From The “Take Care” Duty The Constitution does not say that the President shall execute the laws, but that “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed,” i.e., by others, who are commonly, but not always with strict accuracy, termed his subordinates. What powers are implied from this duty? In this connection, five categories of executive power should be distinguished: first, there is that executive power which the Constitution confers directly upon the President by the opening clause of article II and, in more specific terms, by succeeding clauses of the same article; secondly, there is the sum total of the powers which acts of Congress at any particular time confer upon the President; thirdly, there is the sum total of discretionary powers which acts of Congress at any particular time confer upon heads of departments and other executive (“administrative”) agencies of the National Government; fourthly, there is the power which stems from the duty to enforce the criminal statutes of the United States; finally, there are so-called “ministerial duties” which admit of no discretion as to the occasion or the manner of their discharge. Three principal questions arise: first, how does the President exercise the powers which the Constitution or the statutes confer upon him; second, in what relation does he stand by virtue of the Take Care Clause to the powers of other executive or administrative agencies; third, in what relation does he stand to the enforcement of the criminal laws of the United States?701

Whereas the British monarch is constitutionally under the necessity of acting always through agents if his acts are to receive legal recognition, the President is presumed to exercise certain of his constitutional powers personally. In the words of an opinion by Attorney General Cushing in 1855: “It may be presumed that he, the man discharging the presidential office, and he alone, grants reprieves and pardons for offenses against the United States. . . . So he, and he alone, is the supreme commander in chief of the Army and Navy of the United States, and of the militia of the several States when called into the actual service of the United States. That is a power constitutionally inherent in the person of the President. No act of Congress, no act even of the President himself, can, by constitutional possibility, authorize or create any military officer not subordinate to the President.”702 Moreover, the obligation to act personally may be sometimes enlarged by statute, as, for example, by the act organizing the President with other designated officials into “an Establishment by name of the Smithsonian Institute.” Here, says the Attorney General, “the President’s name of office is designatio personae.” He was also of opinion that expenditures from the “secret service” fund, in order to be valid, must be vouched for by the President personally.703 On like grounds the Supreme Court once held void a decree of a court martial, because, though it has been confirmed by the Secretary of War, it was not specifically stated to have received the sanction of the President as required by the 65th Article of War.704 This case has, however, been virtually overruled, and at any rate such cases are exceptional.705

The general rule, as stated by the Court, is that when any duty is cast by law upon the President, it may be exercised by him through the head of the appropriate department, whose acts, if performed within the law, thus become the President’s acts.706 Williams v. United States707 involved an act of Congress that prohibited the advance of public money in any case whatever to disbursing officers of the United States, except under special direction by the President.708

The Supreme Court held that the act did not require the personal performance by the President of this duty. Such a practice, said the Court, if it were possible, would absorb the duties of the various departments of the government in the personal acts of one chief executive officer, and be fraught with mischief to the public service. The President’s duty in general requires his superintendence of the administration; yet he cannot be required to become the administrative officer of every department and bureau, or to perform in person the numerous details incident to services which, nevertheless, he is, in a correct sense, by the Constitution and laws required and expected to perform.709 As a matter of administrative practice, in fact, most orders and instructions emanating from the heads of the departments, even though in pursuance of powers conferred by statute on the President, do not even refer to the President.710

--snip--long read

23 posted on 03/03/2021 7:55:03 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: All

15 Dead From Human Smuggling Incident Is A Direct Result Of Biden’s Immigration Actions
enVolve / FR Posted on 3/3/2021, 10:49:23 AM by A.M. Smith

Each of these fifteen people would be alive today had Biden and the Democrats not incentivized criminal cartels to monetize illegal entry into the US.

Let’s recap.

Twenty-five people were packed into a vehicle on a highway. Why is that a problem? – For Biden’s War on Covid, that’s a massive potential transmission vector, and Heaven alone knows how many others like it there are. – For border security, there’s a freaking 10-foot hole in the border fence. – For immigration, forgiveness for illegal entry is made easier than permission for lawful entry (meaning we have no control mechanism for weeding out the people coming over with criminal intent)

(Excerpt) Read more at en-volve.com ...


24 posted on 03/03/2021 7:57:08 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

No. There are two elements necessary: (1) levying war against the United States, and (2) involvement with a foreign power.

The Founders could not have envisioned a people so stupid and morally bankrupt.


25 posted on 03/03/2021 7:58:47 AM PST by Salvavida
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

My first take on this was the same as many have stated: US law very narrowly defines treason, and even if this was contemptible and utterly dishonest, it was electoral politics, not a concerted effort to overthrow the Constitution.

On second look, a cabal of billionaire tech moguls, corporate media, government officials, lawyers, judges, et al., have conspired, with patent violation of the 1st Amendment and subversion of electoral democracy as tools, to install a corrupt, demented puppet as head of state. Their openly stated goal is to fundamentally change America. Their methods and aims include stripping away Constitutional rights, starting with the 1st and 2nd Amendments, thus ending individual freedom ad opening the gate to totalitarianism. Our Constitution affords election of a President, who presides over the State. A cabal has substituted itself for the Chief Executive. Seen like that, yes, the cabal has committed treason. The conspiracy is too deep, too widespread, and too political to prosecute. No doubt they counted on that. We’re screwed.


26 posted on 03/03/2021 7:59:19 AM PST by Chewbarkah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

No.


27 posted on 03/03/2021 7:59:25 AM PST by DoodleDawg
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

If Joe Biden is mentally impaired, does that mean that every Executive Order and Congressional Bill he has signed is invalid?


28 posted on 03/03/2021 8:00:05 AM PST by zeestephen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

No.


29 posted on 03/03/2021 8:11:02 AM PST by SaxxonWoods (The Republican Party is dead. Long live the MAGA Party.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 1Old Pro

Ted Cruz says he does not have cognitive issues and we should not be saying that he does.


30 posted on 03/03/2021 8:12:23 AM PST by Lurkinanloomin (Natural Born Citizens Are Born Here of Citizen Parents)(Know Islam, No Peace - No Islam, Know Peace)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin

I can accept that Biden was always that cognitively challenged !

There’s plenty of past evidence !


31 posted on 03/03/2021 8:14:46 AM PST by Reily
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Lurkinanloomin
Ted Cruz says he does not have cognitive issues and we should not be saying that he does.

I wonder why I never warmed up to Cruz...

32 posted on 03/03/2021 8:15:27 AM PST by 1Old Pro
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: JewishRighter

The John Roberts court had the opportunity to correct all this existential mess but blithely and cowardly dismissed it on “standing”.

At least in Communist China deserving folks get the firing squad!


33 posted on 03/03/2021 8:16:29 AM PST by Cen-Tejas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chauncey Gardiner

> Those who were duped into voting for him will never admit how stupid they look now. <

We know about Biden’s mental decline. But I wonder if most of the folks who voted for him know. After all, if you just get your news from NBC you’ll only see the sanitized stuff. President Biden signs this important executive order. President Biden signs that important executive order.

You won’t be seeing him fumble his words and look confused.


34 posted on 03/03/2021 8:18:45 AM PST by Leaning Right (I have already previewed or do not wish to preview this composition )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah

Good summation on the the state of our Union as we now stand. We carry on because the only alternative is total retreat to slavery under communist rule. Live free or die is the bottom line for this Republic.


35 posted on 03/03/2021 8:18:57 AM PST by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Bearshouse
I used to be scared to voice this in the fear that we would just get a Harris presidency, but whatever... we already have it.

I dunno.

If it's true that joek's puppeteers didn't notify Harris The CGHo that they were going to strike Syria, then we don't really know what's going on at The Puppet Palace.

36 posted on 03/03/2021 8:28:20 AM PST by kiryandil (New Movie: The Assassination Of Ashli Babbitt By The Anonymous Coward)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tennessee Nana; AuntB; TADSLOS
Jon Feere, former COS and senior advisor to ICE Director, "the Biden Admin locked twitter @ICEAlerts because":
<><> if apprehensive Americans were to report the location of these dangerous aliens to ICE,
<><> it would raise a huge red flag........
<><> Biden's liberal policies gives criminals a pass to enter the US to be subsidized by law-abiding Americans;
<><> the Biden OK list includes known criminals w/ rap sheets,
<><> including violent assaulters, drug dealers, thieves, drunk drivers, and sex offenders.

37 posted on 03/03/2021 8:34:01 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: null and void
I am wondering if FRAUD would pass the legal test for what the commie dems have done with putting a mentally impaired person into the position of President of the USA. If not TREASON then what? The revelation that millions of voters would knowingly vote for Biden, knowing his condition, is unforgivable as well as unforgettable for me. Those I know still will not admit what has been done. They do not care who rules them as long as it is a commie democrat.
38 posted on 03/03/2021 8:34:23 AM PST by mountainfolk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: All

Democrats’ post-election power-tripping is downright dangerous.

Democrats’ aggressiveness is out of control.....and it keeps escalating to dangerous levels.

The arrogant Dems seem to “get off” on bullying, and relegating those of us not a member of their “Club Lib” to powerlessness.

REALTY CHECK The U.S. Dept of Education, and many mental health professionals, define bullying as verbal aggression,
repeated over a period, involving using an imbalance of power, and calculated acts to exclude people (cancel culture).

The bully repeatedly uses status to exert power and to hurt bullying targets....includes use of harassment,
rumor mongering, threatening anyone who supports their targets....and other forms of intimidation.

While state laws have little consistency in their definition of bullying, we would do well to change state laws
to make Democrat bullying......and other manifestations like cancel culture exclusion......a punishable crime.


39 posted on 03/03/2021 8:38:16 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Chewbarkah
NICE DECONSTRUCTION: a secretive cabal of billionaire tech moguls, corporate media, government officials, lawyers, judges, et al., have colluded and conspired, in violation of the 1st Amendment and subversion of electoral democracy, to install a corrupt, demented puppet as head of state.

The cabal's openly stated goal is to fundamentally change America. Their methods and aims include:
<><> stripping away Constitutional rights,
<><> prioritizing the crucial 1st and 2nd Amendments,
<><> obliterating individual freedom.
<><> opening the door to totalitarianism.

The subrosa cabal has substituted itself for the Chief Executive, even as the US Constitution affords election of a President, who presides over the State. The conspiracy is too deep, too widespread, and too political to prosecute. No doubt they counted on that. Against that backdrop, the cabal has committed treason. IOW, we’re screwed.

40 posted on 03/03/2021 8:46:01 AM PST by Liz (Our side has 8 trillion bullets; the other side doesn't know which bathroom to use. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-55 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson