[BobL]

I’ll ask again here:

Name ‘insurrection’ from the past 500 years that did not involve the use of firearms by the people attacking the government. Not possible.

The fact that the media continues to call this an ‘insurrection’, when, at most they could call it a ‘violent riot’ should scare the crap out of the country (including liberals). The fact that they get away with using that term shows that nothing short of total violence will change things here...and I don’t see that coming.

[MtnClimber]

Who were the people yelling “this way, this way” to the Trump supporters they duped into entering the Capitol Building.

[GrandJediMasterYoda]

The definition of an “insurrection” to democrats and the treason media is someone who moves Nancy Pelosis lecturn 8 feet while Anifa burning the Federal court in Portland for the past year is not an insurrection.

[SeafoodGumbo]

"Name ‘insurrection’ from the past 500 years that did not involve the use of firearms by the people attacking the government. Not possible."

Exactly. This supposed insurrection was carried out by people whose average age was probably 40, who went unarmed, and who went home before dark as told to. Quite an "insurrection".

[Jim Noble]

when, at most they could call it a ‘violent riot’

Well, it wasn't violent and it wasn't a riot, other than that, it's a perfect description.