“Hand waving away deaths and side effects is absolutely irresponsible.”
I did not do that.
The entire question I posed was NOT in regard to deaths as concerns any Covid-19 vaccine in general but was 100% on the lousy report claiming to identify something it did not, by the evidence, identify; because it conflated terms to imply things the evidence did not substantiate.
Like I said, there is nothing worse about a good premise than the use of false “evidence” to make the point.
The subject requires a massively better and more factual report than what was offered to start the thread.
“The subject requires a massively better and more factual report than what was offered to start the thread.”
It is all we have.
Without the independent double-blind long-term testing, and a lot of subject data (which is what the people receiving the vaccines are: subjects), it will be impossible to assign injury to this particular vaccine.
It raises so many questions that I could write an essay on it. But I won’t.